Ruger’s Mini-14: Still Relevant or Outdated Relic?

I remember growing up in the 90s when literally everything was different than it is today. AR-15s were generally seen as verboten among anyone and everyone except those who already on the fringes, the AK was nearly nonexistent, but the Norinco SKS was very much an acceptable weapon and usually seen as an even poorer man’s 30-30. Old reruns of the A Team were still on every now and again, with their trademark weapon, the AC-556, failing to hit anything other than dirt after the inevitable firefight. Yep, times were simpler. Not better.

The Mini 14 find itself at home in an everyday working battery.

That AC-556 always fascinated me as sort of a throwback to another time, and its parent weapon, the Ruger Mini 14, could be found in any Wal-Mart. And still can. With its wood stock and blued metal finish, it always looked far less menacing than any of its contemporaries. Having the alternate name of Ranch Rifle, its at home among a working battery you’ll find on any family farm. A rifle you could have on the gun rack in the back glass of the truck and nobody would bat an eye at…unless you stuck one of those junky flea market 30 rounders in it. A lot of people had them and still do in many rural areas, not to mention the ones still in the hands of police and corrections staff. But the original Mini left a lot to be desired- we shot the snot out of an early one (Pre-181, before the polymer heat shield upper) when I was a teen and immediately I knew why Hannibal Smith never hit squat. That might be a little dramatic, but about ten rounds in the point of impact would definitely start wandering from the point of aim. And since then I never considered it anything aside from a weapon for people who, for whatever reason, just don’t want an AR. Or maybe can’t have an AR.

SOF Editor Robert K. Brown, top center, carrying one of two stainless Mini 14s in Rhodesia.

The Mini 14 had an interesting development history. Weapons designer James Sullivan, who worked on scaling down the AR-10 to become the AR-15, began development of a scaled down M-14 along with Bill Ruger in the early 70s. It caught on with many Law Enforcement agencies, Ranchers, Farmers, and what would become the Survivalist Movement of the era due to its familiarity among most contemporary Veterans and coupled with the fact that it wasn’t the AR, which had a checkered reputation. One that’s been since rectified, but still, was fresh in the minds of the many. It didn’t hurt that the Mini 14 was quite a bit cheaper, either on top of having a familiar look to other rifles you’d find in a white oak gun cabinet. While they marketed it in limited numbers to military and police customers, it really took off with civilians, leading in part to Bill Ruger’s now infamous self imposed ban on high capacity magazines for it and support for a Federal ban on the magazines. While that move tarnished Ruger’s reputation among many, the weapon was still a favorite. After all, he sent a couple with Bob Brown to Rhodesia for a Soldier Of Fortune excursion…nobody’s all bad.

The Mini 14 definitely has that throwback feel to an older era. But it still has a place, even considering all that’s changed.

I always thought of it as an updated M1 Carbine- a light, fast handling weapon in an old school design. Its my understanding that around 2007 Ruger started putting heavier barrels and paying more attention to building a weapon capable of more than minute-of-man accuracy. They had long since started putting polymer heat shields over the barrel, but the gas system needed some attention and got it. In the years since its original introduction a lot has changed though. The AR-15 doesn’t have the stigma it used to, and being cheaper and simpler to accessorize, the Mini doesn’t have the market share it once did. But that said is it still relevant or is it just a throwback to a bygone era?

No, the Mini 14 is not an AR. But it is a little brother to the Garand.

I’ll state up front that no, it’s not an AR. Its not in the same league in ergonomics as far as magazine drills go, but then again, the little carbine is just as simple to teach people to use as a Kalashnikov. The old Garand action works, and never did I ever hear of anyone complaining about the controls on the M-14 EBRs (Carrying one of those was a different story, the Sage EBR stock sucks) but if you’re coming from the AR-15, you’re probably not going to be a happy camper. Magazines are proprietary and nowhere near as plentiful (or reliable) in the aftermarket, and if anything breaks, good luck on spare parts. And while the accuracy out of the one I have in hand is perfectly adequate for a field weapon, its nothing to write home about.

Which one of these would get the most negative attention? Which one might go unnoticed?

All that said the little weapon has plenty of merits. No, it’s not an AR. For some shooters the AR-15 is intimidating, and it takes some training to master. The Mini has a pretty shallow learning curve. And while those magazines are a little slower to change, they’re still not really that slow…again, on par with the Kalash. The weapon itself is pretty simple to maintain. But the biggest advantage the Mini has is that its not an AR; still, after all these years, it doesn’t carry the signature high profile that an AR-15 does. While that AR is far more commonplace today, a Mini has that certain plausible deniability that you won’t get with its contemporaries. That might not matter to you, but you never know. It’s not intimidating, its just Papa’s plinking rifle, until it ain’t. And for that reason the Mini is still obtainable in many states that ban other weapons in its category. Its reliable. You can get it in stainless steel which is great for salt water environments. And its a heck of a lot of fun to shoot on those why-so-serious? range sessions.

So is the Mini 14 still relevant as a serious defensive carbine? I think it is. While easily outclassed by the AR-15 today, a bubba with a Mini, coupled with training (and the will to kill) shouldn’t be considered outgunned. The Mini would not be on my short list for combat use but then again that’s not why I own one, and for that matter there’s a huge lot of ARs out there I wouldn’t consider ever carrying either (Poverty Pony, anyone?). Its not a bad weapon by any means and if I had to use it in that combat role, mine has given me no reason to think I couldn’t press it into service. For some that just might be the only real option you’ve got. Jim Sullivan designed a simple, reliable carbine that works pretty well for what a good number of folks need- a light, sturdy working gun. Maybe not mil-spec or tacticool, but then again, maybe it doesn’t always have to be.

Spread the love
                

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the Author: admin

29 Comments

  1. anonymous May 3, 2019 at 06:59

    I consider it more of a ‘ranch rifle’ than battle rifle. Its light, short and handy, much like the lever carbines of the past. But with magazines easier to load.

    The controls and sights of the Mini share simularities and the same locations as the Garand and M1-A, so there is that as well. The big minus for many years was the lack of RELIABLE hi-cap magazines, but then that was fixed. The pencil barrelled models are not target rifles – more like pie plate accuracy inside 100 yards. You can make improvements, but there is only so far you can go without changing it to a heavy bench gun. A little tweaking – its a good one.

  2. SemperFido May 3, 2019 at 07:22

    Proprietary magazines killed any possibility of me buying one or a minl 30 for that matter. I always felt that was a huge mistake on Bill Ruger’s part. My brother had a stainless one and we had some fun with it but as soon as the Clinton ban expired we both wasted no time in acquiring something else.

    • NC Scout May 5, 2019 at 06:59

      I agree. It would be neat if they had an AR mag conversion.

  3. James May 3, 2019 at 07:34

    A friend has the 30 in 7.62,seems to work just fine every time I see it out and about shooting,one of only a few rifles of his that have actual wood furniture.

  4. Matt in Oklahoma May 3, 2019 at 08:31

    Still Relevant? For all my training and tactical goods it will probably be some kid with a Sears 22 bolt action single shot with a bent front sight that kills me.
    There is better and there is worse but underestimation will be a downfall

  5. Homer May 3, 2019 at 08:59

    This brings back memories. As a child of the 80s I grew up with SOF, American Survival Guide and Parallax catalogs. Had 2 mini 14s at one time but got rid of them both. Even have those books in the pics. If u don’t have it I highly recommend Ragnars book “ How to live off the land in the city and country”. It greatly influenced my ideas when in high school.

    • Matt in Oklahoma May 3, 2019 at 16:09

      Homer I don’t know if you know but ASG is back in business. It’s not bad

    • Matt Bracken May 5, 2019 at 10:18

      I think you mean Paladin Press. I was a big customer!

      • Homer May 6, 2019 at 09:14

        Nope, parallax. Along with brigade quartermasters one of the few mail order catalogs to order military and outdoor gear at the time. Reading Zerhoun now matt, great book.

  6. Anonymous May 3, 2019 at 09:25

    5

  7. J.F. May 3, 2019 at 10:48

    Ive owned two Mini 14s, both were not very good firearms. One was a 6-8″ gun at 100 yards and the other wouldnt feed right. I hear some people have better luck with them but I definitely was not one of them, give me an AR or AK for a fighting rifle at that price range.

  8. Anonymous May 3, 2019 at 11:42

    3.5

  9. Stormer May 3, 2019 at 14:17

    I’ve had the “upgraded” Mini-14, in ATI dress, for a couple of years and while I agree with most of this article, the reference to unreliable after market magazines doesn’t ring true. The TAPCO GenII 30 round mags work just fine, thank you.

  10. Arthur Sido May 3, 2019 at 20:46

    The biggest advantage of the Mini-14 is something you mentioned. It looks very innocuous to the untrained eye, until you seat a 30 round mag. The old after-market metal ones were junk but the newer ones seem to work just fine. Most people wouldn’t bat an eye at a Mini-14 with the standard magazine but any AR is going to scare some people.

    Not being compatible with AR stuff is a problem but as a secondary weapon it is OK assuming you already have it. Otherwise you can get a brand new AR and a bunch of ammo for the same price as a wood stock Mini-14 (around $800 at Bud’s).

  11. Matt Bracken May 5, 2019 at 10:15

    I had one for years. It was amazingly reliable. On a boat trip where we planned to go from San Diego to Panama non-stop, we had to put into southern Mexico for fuel. Having weapons found on board (and they came aboard and searched, in black BDUs and K-pots, with a German shepherd K-9). A “sea cache” was out of the question, way too deep very close to land. Anyway, we shot all the ammo we had on board, over a thousand rounds, before deep-sixing our guns. For the final torture test, I had crew reloading mags while I fired and changed mags as fast as humanly possible. When the gun got super hot, (I was standing on the swim platform) I just plunged the barrel into the ocean, put in a new mag, and kept firing. It never failed to feed and fire. Not very accurate, mediocre ergonomics at best, but it was brute tough and would keep shooting as long as you kept feeding it. And what comes out of the muzzle is just as deadly as what comes out of a thousand-dollar AR.

    • Daniel Shays May 6, 2019 at 14:23

      That’s one of the coolest stories I’ve ever read in a comments section like this.

  12. vyt1az May 5, 2019 at 15:54

    This really takes me back. I always thought the Mini 14 looked cool and the A-Team definitely contributed to that in my youth. When I heard it didn’t take AR mags and had accuracy issues I put it out of my mind.

    These days if I wanted the Ranch Rifle look and feel but more parts compatibility, I think I’d go with either of these options and put my woodworking tools to good use:

    1. FightLight SCR: https://fightlite.com/scr-002 A bit pricey but takes AR mags (proprietary bolt/spring/buffer though)
    2. Unconverted Imported AK such as:
    a. https://www.reddit.com/r/ak47/comments/biqlz1/traded_an_at_for_this_chinese_hunter_milled/
    b. https://www.reddit.com/r/ak47/comments/bg2nf5/dyed_a_bit_more_than_just_eggs_this_weekend/

    I think the unconverted AK would be the cheapest and easiest make or find. I’m really tempted to see how cheaply I can get one and turn it into a “Ranch Rifle” with basic hand tools.

  13. Redclay May 5, 2019 at 19:49

    Gents, I agree pretty much with all the above that has been stated and glad to know some have torture tested their Mini-14s and that they keep on working. Had the same issues with accuracy my my pre-181 series Mini14 noting the aftermarket services for ‘accurizing’ the Mini-14 and also magazine issues with a later Mini30 until Ruger started to address the problem……

    But something no one has mentioned is that if you need to replace a bolt or major spare parts, you have to send it back to Ruger for replacement. They don’t (correct me is this has changed, but I doubt it) sell major parts. That is an issue that the ARs of today don’t have. So for better or worse I sold my Ruger Minis some years ago.

    I won’t turn one down if offered for free, but we have ARs for that now. I think I still have some Ruger and aftermarket magazines around here someplace I need to put on the trade table…..best, redclay 5/5/19

    • Homer May 6, 2019 at 09:22

      I know the above Ruger policy was still in place in the 90s at least. Ruger would not sell individual parts unless they installed them. Soooooo, i removed all the parts from the mini14 bolt and sent them the bolt to install the parts on. Kept the old parts as my new spare parts kit. A little cumbersome process but it did work.

    • Roland Pattinson May 7, 2019 at 16:22

      For what it is worth https://www.accuracysytemes.com is now an authorized Ruger repair vendor. They also have parts for Remington as well

  14. Anonymous May 6, 2019 at 10:07

    4.5

  15. NC Scout May 6, 2019 at 14:37

    5

  16. Anonymous May 9, 2019 at 14:43

    2.5

  17. Peter May 15, 2019 at 04:58

    I owned a Ruger Mini-14 back when we were allowed to own Semi-Auto Rifles. The bolt would routinely jam up because brass was blowing back into it. I was using cheap Chinese rounds. It was a fun gun though. I couldn’t tell you how it grouped because accuracy isn’t something I’m familiar with. If the bad guy is a 6ft obese man who runs out of breath crossing the road, well he’s chance against me is about even.

  18. Mike Fink September 30, 2019 at 17:25

    Any experience or thoughts on upgrading the iron sights to modern optics in the event one was to come across one of these for free?
    Something like the Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50mm Digital NV Riflescope would seem to improve the rifle and add some NV capability for a reasonable price. Just wondering if mounting modern optics on this platform is a problem and if the weapons accuracy limitations would negate any improvement anyway. Thanks.

    • NC Scout September 30, 2019 at 17:34

      GG&G makes a picatinny mount for the Ranch Rifle that’s pretty nice.

  19. Mike Fink September 30, 2019 at 22:20

    Thanks NCScout. the rail type system for this platform seems to be widely available. My apologies for not looking harder before requesting advise. If you could suffer another potentially stupid question, I would appreciate it. My 11b action guy days were in the 1980’s and the M-16 series still had a carrying handle where things could be mounted, but Gen1/ 2 NV was expensive and rare and of limited utility. Thermal was pretty much out of reach to line units and limited to crew served weapons. conventional scopes were for snipers, and that wasnt being done in the line infantry of the time, so Iron sights were it and we thought that was just fine as they were tough and the logic was there was nothing to break. It would seem like I have a lot of catching up to do in regards to shooting evolution and I will have to do more reading about these technologies. The question I have relates to the day/night compatability of these accesories. It seems to me that the best daytime sight for quickley engaging mid or near range targets would not be useful at night and the ideal thermal or infrared sights would be in the way during daylight. Are these systems designed to be quickley swapped out in the field and is that the common practice? Thanks again,

    • NC Scout October 1, 2019 at 04:22

      Thermal is the better option.

  20. Gryphon November 20, 2019 at 17:00

    I bought one of the early Models the second year they were on the Market – at the Gun Counter in K-Mart, a Department Store… Got it because it was a near Replica of an Uncle’s M1 Carbine, that Grandpa had ‘borrowed’ from the Army in WWII. Shot the crap out of it as a Plinker for many Years, not caring that it shot Minute-of-Beer-Can and not much else beyond 100 Meters. Trouble came when a friend with an AR turned me on to cheap, surplus M-193 Ball, and the Overpressure in the .223 Chamber beat up the Bolt and Op Rod until Failure about 2,000 rounds later. Some Years later, I Rebuilt it with a 5.56 Barrel, New Bolt and Rod. Still doesn’t hit much past 200, but now I see it as a Backup Gun behind the rest of the Arsenal.

Comments are closed.

GUNS N GEAR

Categories

Archives

Spread the love