LPVO, What It Means by J89

There is a proliferation of low powered variable optics (LPVO) across the spectrum. Military, civilian and police are all making moves in that direction. When asked why, the common response is “its magnified…duhh” or “I can PID further away”. Most however employ the LPVO like a red dot with magnification

I had heard long ago a quote (I cannot substantiate it) from Erwin Rommel. When asked what his most important weapon was, he replied “binoculars”.

Why? Seeing first, more or farther allows us to begin to make decisions and take action, earlier than the opposition. In some cases, the opposition does not even know.

While most people know the answer to why the LPVO is gaining in popularity, few understand or conceptualize the magnitude of the capability they bring to combat.

Using the suspected Erwin Rommel quote earlier. The LPVO means each rifleman can have a set of binoculars (well technically monocular). However, a tool is only good if you use it.

So, what does seeing first, more and farther actually mean.

If I have detected OPFOR before they have seen me (first) my decision making process is much different than if I walk into a drag race to the “up-drill”.

Seeing first allows me the possibility to:

-Array my forces to maximize my chances of success (ambush, occupy prominent terrain)
-Deliver organic fires (cause a casualty to limit their mobility or limit/force their decision making)
-Deliver supporting arms
-Begin to maneuver (the essence of gun fighting is maneuver, the essence of maneuver is movement under load)
-Break contact and fade away without him knowing

Or you can do any combination of the above (and more). But that first detection, is brought to you by seeing first.

Seeing more can be hard to explain in writing. If anyone has watched war footage from Ukraine, Syria, Iraq, Africa. It is exceptionally rare to ever see an enemy combatant. This may be because its video. However I would wager, the guys in the videos had a hard time seeing as well. Any historical study of combat often annotates how hard it is to see the enemy. The LVPO gives us the ability to see more. Some examples:

-Modern Afghan war footage always shows the massive expanse of fields separated by 5-10m thinly packed treeline. LVPO make it significantly easier to see through one of those treelines and into the field or next treeline. Think about this both offensively and defensively

-Syria and Ukraine footage often shows soldiers engaging from deep within rooms. LVPOs allow me to see from external to internal of a room and potentially identify whats IN the ROOM not just in the window

-You are not always presented the target you want. Elbows, Knees, ankles and feet are often forgotten about when people are being sneaky. They leave these out from behind trees, walls, cars etc. This may or may not be a target, but it certainly tells you someone is there.

-If people are using cover you usually only get very small glimpses of them. At 100m I doubt I can reliably identify a guy peaking the left edge of his head out from a wall. However at 4x, I absolutely can see that. And I have a system that is easy enough to be precise with, to score that hit.

Seeing further also goes hand in hand with engaging further. Lots of shooters adopt LVPO, but then say “I’m not a sniper” or “I’m not trying to do sniper things”. Snipers primary job is usually observation. A Rifleman’s primary job is to reduce point targets with rifles… That sniper math everyone is scarred of, is easily learned and applied to 5.56 carbines using 4x or higher optics. Which means you have increased your threat ring.

Now all that said, the employment of the LPVO is a skill that needs to be trained. I have taken courses by 2 “national level” instructors and was sadly disappointed with the material.

The obvious skill that needs to be trained is marksmanship. I am not going to dive too deep into that.

The other skill (seeing first, more and further) needs to be practiced as well. The logistical problem usually encountered with this type of training is space/terrain. Its not very culturally appropriate to do this type of thing in your back yard. However some skills to sharpen this include

-Just look at treelines from 100m+ through your optic. Do not just look though. Actually see. See the stumps of each tree, identify likely firing points, identify what spots would be cover, determine how far back into the treeline you can see, make some guesstimates on what your hold and sight picture would be

-Go bird watching….with your LPVO

-Using safely UNLOADED weapons, play hide and seek or set up stalking lanes with your friends.

-Go hunting… using your LVPO

Analysis or planning of modern combat always comes down to both sides overlaying the ranges they are effective to, and what they think their enemy’s effective ranges are. The goal, is to be outside the enemy’s threat ring, while they are inside yours. Extend your threat ring and see first. For the same reason night vision and thermals are such a force multiplier, the LVPO can be also.

I will leave you with:

Look deep and in. NOT “at”

Look at it from a perspective of “where would I be”. Identify those points, prioritize, scan and move on.

Spread the love
                
By Published On: October 9, 2020Categories: Guest Authors, Weapons7 Comments on LPVO, What It Means by J89

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the Author: NC Scout

NC Scout is the nom de guerre of a former Infantry Scout and Sergeant in one of the Army’s best Reconnaissance Units. He has combat tours in both Iraq and Afghanistan. He teaches a series of courses focusing on small unit skills rarely if ever taught anywhere else in the prepping and survival field, including his RTO Course which focuses on small unit communications. In his free time he is an avid hunter, bushcrafter, writer, long range shooter, prepper, amateur radio operator and Libertarian activist. He can be contacted at [email protected] or via his blog at brushbeater.wordpress.com .

7 Comments

  1. Bud Green October 10, 2020 at 22:12

    I’m thinking of getting a Vortex Strike Eagle LPVO for one of my carbines. I know that they are inexpensive but does anyone have experience with them?

    • Karl Dahl October 12, 2020 at 15:59

      Vortex Strike Eagle optics are excellent! Buy with confidence

      • brunop October 13, 2020 at 00:15

        “… are excellent …” for the money you spend. It’s not like they are great scopes – they’re great scopes for two hundred bucks.

        I bought two copies of your book, BTW. Very much liked it and would buy other titles.

    • Matt October 13, 2020 at 09:22

      Strike Eagle are good. I have a Burris. Like the reticle better. Similar to the Primary Arms. 1×6 is the minimum I would go.

  2. brunop October 11, 2020 at 01:20

    Is the site broken again?

  3. brunop October 13, 2020 at 00:53

    Just before the site experienced its latest difficulty I wrote some long-winded crap about optics and personal choices. Basically I think if we all had unlimited budgets we’d all be shooting NightForce 1-8x with lightweight RDS @ 45* as back up sights. Everything else is our personal effort to compromise within our budget constraints.

    I have no combat experience, so my opinions are formed in competitive shooting events like Run ‘n’ Guns and 3-Gun. One event in particular taught me a few things about red dots versus LPVO optics and “general purpose” or “all around” optics.

    At the 5th Group “Legion” 9/11 Memorial Run ‘n’ Gun, several active duty 5th Group guys showed up the first year with Eotechs & AR-15s to a muddy and rainy 10K course with obstacles, creek crossings, and seven shooting stages. I watched 100% of 5th Group shooters DNF at least two stages because they couldn’t find targets less than 75 yards away through their rainy and muddy 1x red dots. Most or all of the locals who had inexpensive 3-9x hunting scopes on ARs found the targets and got their hits – though they looked way less cool…

    At this year’s “Legion” 10K I tried to go “lightweight” and took a 5 lb. AR-15 with a 1-4 Vortex (PST Gen I – also a very good scope for the money since I bought it after the Gen II came out…). It bit me in the ass. Couldn’t see well enough to get hits on the small targets (10″ and 12″ steel) at 300 and 350. I could see them, but dusty and shot-up 3MOA and 4MOA steel on a gravel road shot from a wooden horse after running 9K with a 50 lb. pack on top of rifle, ammo, and water made me realize that more magnification is sometimes useful when targets are obscured or partly camouflaged and/or other things aren’t optimal.

    My eyes are still okay-good: I shoot irons in multiple competitions, and IPSC targets at 600 are (mostly) not a problem. That being said, in my opinion, 4x isn’t enough magnification to do what the author is saying LPVOs are for: “Seeing” and “Looking through”. Even 1-6x is a compromise because we don’t want to spend $1100 on the PA 1-8x w ACSS, $2000 for Vortex Gen III 1-10x, or three or four large on NightForce or German glass (and US Optics is overpriced for the [lack of] quality you get…).

    Red Dots are for kicking doors and/or defending your house, only. They are useless for “seeing” or “looking through”. If we’re going to compromise, or have ‘That One Optic’ to do all the jobs – from CQB to patrolling to DMR and/or Scout – we should at least get the ones that can do the jobs we have to do – which is going to take 1-8x. This job can probably be done by inexpensive Leupy 2-7x or even 3-9x Gold Ring hunting scopes, but ACOG seems like too much for CQB, and isn’t enough magnification for “seeing” or “looking through”. I think less expensive 1-8x is the way – even if PA glass isn’t as ‘nice’ as an ACOG or German Schott glass.

    Great article. Thanks for taking the time.

  4. Anonymous October 13, 2020 at 00:53

    4.5

Comments are closed.

GUNS N GEAR

Categories

Archives

Spread the love