US Incorporated: Examining Voter Fraud in 2020 and Beyond

Originally posted at US Incorporated, a heck of a good site and written by an awesome author. They should definitely be on your daily read list. -NCS

By Allan Wall, December 2, 2020

Election Day was four weeks ago, it’s now December. Though the Mainstream Media has already called it for Biden, the election is still in contention, and Team Trump is still fighting.

However things turn out, it’s past high time for our country to take voter fraud seriously and work to eliminate it.

Regarding the 2020 presidential election, there are still many reasons to be suspicious of Biden victories in the contested swing states; at least they need to be investigated.

A recent piece at Revolver entitled, Here’s What The GOP Can Do Right Now to Make Sure No US Election is Ever Compromised Again summarizes the situation thusly: “Meanwhile, Democrats seized upon the 2020 coronavirus to create a massive national mail-in and early voting system, all while stripping voter fraud protections to a bare minimum. Beyond any doubt, they will try to repeat this system in all elections to come, even after the coronavirus is long gone.”

Revolver’s solutions are as follows:

1. Make absentee voting rare again
2. Get rid of electronic voting
3. Count the vote immediately

The article commends the state of Florida which, after the 2000 election, improved its voting system. It’s a state in which 99% of the votes were counted within 6 hours.

The Washington Times reported a study by the Just Facts institute, which analyzed the election in seven swing states: Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada. The study estimates that Biden received “thousands of illegal votes by noncitizens.” (See ‘One kind of fraud’: Biden won thousands of illegal votes by noncitizens, study shows).

Just last year, the state of Texas compared voter rolls to driver’s licenses, which in Texas show immigration status. Lo and behold, the search discovered 95,000 noncitizens registered to vote.

For years, I’ve been writing about Mexico’s voter registration system, which is a good one. Why can’t we have one like Mexico’s?

The Spectator USA published a Patrick Basham piece entitled Reasons Why the 2020 Presidential Election is Deeply Puzzling which contains a good summary of the evidence for fraud – various statistical comparisons, Biden’s lack of coattails, and non-polling metrics.

Then there were the specific anomalies in the swing states:

  1. With Trump leading, the counting stops, observers removed, counting resumes
  2. “Statistically abnormal vote counts”
  3. Counting of late-arriving ballots
  4. “The failure to match signatures on mail-in ballots. The destruction of mail-in ballot envelopes, which must contain signatures”
  5. Low rates of mail-in ballot rejection, compared to previous elections
  6. Votes that went missing in Pennsylvania
  7. Non-resident voters in Georgia
  8. Breaks in chain of custody, invalid addresses, dead voters, mail-in ballots without creases
  9. Statistical anomalies in Biden’s favor

When you look at this, and other anomalies, you see a pattern. Sure, some cases could be coincidental, but all of them?

Furthermore, some of the sketchy procedures used in this election have been, when the shoe was on the other foot, criticized or at least questioned by Democrats in the past.

You know, it’s about whose ox is being gored.

For example, before 2020, Democrats complained about election software. But now, in 2020 it must be A-okay because it favored Biden in the swing states. Funny how that works.

If you have half a minute to spare, check out this video from the heady days of 2008, in which then-candidate Barack Obama tells the-man-who-got-a-thrill-up-his-leg-to-hear-him-speak that mail-in ballots would have to be verified in order to be fraud-proof. Obama, in other words, was implying that they could be fraudulent.

More recently, a Rasmussen Reports survey, taken November 19-21, revealed majority support for:

1. Removal from voter files of voters who move or die
2. “All mail-in ballots must be received by election day”
3. Results should be announced on election night
4. Representatives of both parties should be allowed to be present during collection and counting of ballots

It looks like politicians or a party who want to reform our election procedures would have support from the public.

How about doing that?

Visit Allan’s website.

Mr. Wall’s previous blog entries on this topic are here and here.

Spread the love
                

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the Author: NC Scout

NC Scout is the nom de guerre of a former Infantry Scout and Sergeant in one of the Army’s best Reconnaissance Units. He has combat tours in both Iraq and Afghanistan. He teaches a series of courses focusing on small unit skills rarely if ever taught anywhere else in the prepping and survival field, including his RTO Course which focuses on small unit communications. In his free time he is an avid hunter, bushcrafter, writer, long range shooter, prepper, amateur radio operator and Libertarian activist. He can be contacted at [email protected] or via his blog at brushbeater.wordpress.com .

6 Comments

  1. James December 17, 2020 at 09:41

    “It looks like politicians or a party who want to reform our election procedures would have support from the public.”

    Sure,am all for it,after we square this election away.

    • Randolph Scott December 17, 2020 at 21:32

      Right answer. Fix this election or there will not be a next time.

  2. J December 17, 2020 at 13:26

    A good article. With all the evidence it’s difficult to see how anyone can think there wasn’t much voter fraud going on.

    As an aside, it’s entirely appropriate that ‘US Incorporated’ be juxtaposed against ‘Old Glory’ within the heading of this article.

    The reason being is that the US flag of today is closely derived from the first national flag (ie the ‘Grand Union’ flag) from circa 1776, a flag which in turn that was for practical purposes all but identical to the multinational corporation British East India Company flag of that time. (See links below).

    [1776 was also the year the defacto Capitalist manifesto, Smith’s ‘Wealth of Nations’, along with Gibbon’s masterpiece on the Roman Empire, were first published. These are all things which shouldn’t be seen as ‘coincidental’.]

    And, no, I don’t buy the idea sometimes implied that the Founding Fathers were a bunch of unsophisticates, hay seeds really, who weren’t quite aware of the ‘striking resemblance’ between the Grand Union flag they chose to symbolize the 1776 Revolution, and the already existing BEIC flag.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Union_Flag

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_the_East_India_Company

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wealth_of_Nations#

  3. FlyBy December 17, 2020 at 16:01

    I say we take a lesson from Iraq. You show up in person to vote. No mail in voting, no absentee unless you’re active duty government service. You present ID to confirm you’re eligible and on the voter roles. Cast your vote, then dip your finger in the ink well. Done.

    • James December 17, 2020 at 19:26

      Fly,that tis a system and mark(temporary)I am willing to take.

  4. Machine Trooper December 17, 2020 at 21:42

    Here’s a couple of truths that few people (whatever their political convictions) will acknowledge:

    1. Both major parties are actively working toward the destruction of the republic. One of those parties simply pretends to not be.

    2. Marxists (whether they call themselves “liberal,” “moderate,” or some other deceptive and self-aggrandizing term) place no value on honesty, and are incapable of changing their minds after being presented evidence.

    “True” and “false” don’t have the same meaning for them as they have for you. The only value they even see in the words is their power over the proles (who are almost begging to be hoodwinked, and will march obediently into the boxcars as long as the right word games are played. “Truth,” in Newspeak, means “whatever advances Marxism.” “Lie” in Newspeak means “whatever hinders Marxism. Orwell warned us about them. Look at the way they’ve used the words “treason” and “patriotism” for the last four years. That’s just a logical extension of what they had already done to words like liberal, choice, rights, gay, violence, fascism, etc.

    You can show them footage of the Bidens sodomizing a six-year old boy…in their hearts, they would approve, or at least be able to justify it. Through their mouths they would deny it happened, knowing too many of the proles would still be shocked and disgusted if they found out.

    These people approve the theft of the election. It is legitimate, because it advances Marxism. Case closed. But they must deny that theft took place, lest some of the proles wake up. They have no intention of admitting what they are, what they’ve done, or all they hope to do, until it’s too late to resist them.

    However, these people do respect force, and pain. That language they speak fluently. And most of them can’t take it nearly as well as they dish it out. Using words to argue with them is utterly pointless, unless there’s a chance some prole could be awakened by hearing the argument.

    Letting them infiltrate and take over our institutions was suicidal. They will have to be removed by whatever means necessary. After kickoff, we need to be just as brutal as they have been during the pregame.

    No–I take that back. We should be even more brutal than they are–because they understand force and pain, but little else. They attack with a knife? We retaliate with a shotgun. They launch fireworks with nails at us? We hit them with napalm. They shoot at us with 9mm? We return fire with 20mm. This can’t be a “police action” or some lame attempt at a “gentleman’s conflict” wherein we’re more worried about hurting somebody than we are about winning. Nuke ’em ’till they glow, then shoot ’em in the dark. We don’t want or need any William Westmorelands or David McKiernans–we need some Ghengis Khans and William T. Shermans.

    We didn’t ask for this war. We did all we could to avoid it. Guess how much I care about any objections they may voice about how we fight it.

Comments are closed.

GUNS N GEAR

Categories

Archives

Spread the love