WikiLeaks: BENGHAZI WAS OBAMA’S 3 AM CALL
This is from Hillary Clinton’s compromised email server, posted to WikiLeaks.
Never forget just how bad these ‘elites’ have bungled national security, run everything at their own convenience and whim, and had loyalty to none but themselves. I personally have a burning hatred for them. But this email is further proof they have absolutely no idea just what the hell is going on.
None of them. But the Clintons damn sure made a pile of blood money for BP.
That’s why I hung my uniform up and left. Now I teach you.
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05796209 Date: 11/30/2015 RELEASE IN PART B6 Pis print. cdm Begin forwarded message: From : Caitlin Klevorick < Date: October 1, 2012, 8:10:03 PM EDT • GLOBAL VIEW • October 1, 2012, 7:17 p.m. ET
Stephens: Benghazi Was Obama’s 3 a.m. Call Libya was a failure of policy and worldview, not intelligence. Why won’t the Libya story go away? Why can’t the memory of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and his staff be consigned to the same sad-and-sealed file of Americans killed abroad in dangerous line of duty? How has an episode that seemed at first to have been mishandled by the Romney camp become an emblem of a feckless and deluded foreign policy? The story-switching and stonewalling haven’t helped.
But let’s start a little earlier. The hour is 5 p.m., Sept. 11, Washington time, and the scene is an Oval Office meeting among President Obama, the secretary of defense, the national security adviser and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi has been under assault for roughly 90 minutes. Some 30 U.S. citizens are at mortal risk. The whereabouts of Ambassador Stevens are unknown. What is uppermost on the minds of the president and his advisers? The safety of Americans, no doubt. So what are they prepared to do about it? Here is The Wall Street Journal’s account of the meeting: “There was no serious consideration at that hour of intervention with military force, officials said. Doing so without Libya’s permission could represent a violation of sovereignty and UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05796209 Date: 11/30/2015 inflame the situation, they said. Instead, the State Department reached out to the Libyan government to get reinforcements to the scene.”• So it did. Yet the attack was far from over. After leaving the principal U.S. compound, the Americans retreated to a second, supposedly secret facility, which soon came under deadly mortar fire. Time to call in the troops? “Some officials said the U.S. could also have sent aircraft to the scene as a ‘show of force’ to scare off the attackers,” the Journal reported, noting that there’s a U.S. air base just 450 miles away in Sicily. “State Department officials dismissed the suggestions as unrealistic. ‘They would not have gotten there in two hours, four hours or six hours.” The U.S. security detail only left Washington at 8 a.m. on Sept. 12, more than 10 hours after the attacks began. A commercial jet liner can fly from D.C. to Benghazi in about the same time. All this is noted with the benefit of hindsight, and the administration deserves to be judged accordingly. But it also deserves to be judged in light of what it knew prior to the attack, including an attack on the mission in June and heightened threat warnings throughout the summer. So how did the administration do on that count? “That the local security did so well back in June probably gave us a false sense of security,” an unnamed American official who has served in Libya told the New York Times last week. The logic here is akin to supposing that because the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center failed to bring down the towers, nobody need have been concerned thereafter. But let’s still make allowances for the kind of bureaucratic ineptitude that knows neither administration nor political party. The more serious question is why the administration alighted on the idea that the attack wasn’t a terrorist act at all. Also, what did the White House think it had to gain by adopting the jihadist narrative that a supposedly inflammatory video clip was at the root of the trouble? Nobody can say. All the administration will acknowledge is that it has “revised [its] initial assessment to reflect new information that it was a deliberate and organized terrorist attack.” That’s from James Clapper, the director of national intelligence. It suggests that our intelligence agencies are either much dumber than previously supposed (always a strong possibility) or much more politicized (equally plausible). No doubt the ‘ administration would now like to shift blame to Mr. Clapper. But what happened in Benghazi was not a failure of intelligence. It was a failure of policy, stemming from a flawed worldview and the political needs of an election season. Let’s review: The U.S. ignores warnings of a parlous security situation in Benghazi. Nothing happens because nobody is really paying attention, especially in an election year, and because Libya is supposed to be a foreign-policy success. When something does happen, the administration’s concerns for the safety of Americans are subordinated to considerations of Libyan “sovereignty” and the need for “permission.” After the attack the administration blames a video, perhaps because it would be politically inconvenient to note that al Qaeda is far from
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05796209 Date: 11/30/2015
defeated, and that we are no more popular under Mr. Obama than we were under George W. Bush. Denouncing the video also appeals to the administration’s reflexive habits of blaming America first. Once that story falls apart, it’s time to blame the intel munchkins and move on. It was five in the afternoon when Mr. Obama took his 3 a.m. call. He still flubbed it.
Spread the love
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
12 Comments
Comments are closed.
Spread the love
Confirms what I was saying years ago. Military action is firmly under the POTUS and SecDef, not SecState. The initial security problem is on Hillary. The resulting shit-show is on 0bama. The military requires cross-border authority to cross into Libya and defend those Americans. That can come from SecDef or POTUS only, and as far as I know, usually comes from POTUS. That 0300 call was a request for CBA. If I remember correctly, from the reports I read during my time in Army intel, it came from General Carter Ham of AFRICOM. What I read stated that he spoke with POTUS and SecDef multiple times requesting CBA to send US Army SF soldiers from Italy and was told to stand down multiple times.
Obama and Hillary are a shitshow
Please disabuse me if I am wrong; But doesn’t an attack on our diplomatic facilities in Bengahzi demand the same responsibilities and responses of the U.S. Civilian and Military leadership as if the attackers executed their armed attack within CONUS, Alaska, Hawaii, …, on any U.S soil?
Yes, we should contact the host country. And give them a heads-up that WE ARE COMING IN, RIGHT THE FUCK NOW, to aid our Countrymen!
Let’s not forget that after the attacks, U.S. nationals, alive, wounded and dead, were flown out of Libya on Libyan flagged aircraft.
Best of Luck
Joe
Yeah it does. The problem was there wasn’t a country to drop the hammer on, because we already gave it to the johadis. They made a damn mess and had no idea how to get it under control.
Maybe they never wanted to.
Wikileaks is always suspect to me. Won’t go near 9 11 with a barge pole – same with Snowden. Is he CGI/AI ? Has anyone seen him for real? He said on Joe Rogan he has a waist-size of 24″ and only had to drop out of training because he ‘broke his legs’ and then course corrected to shin splints – huh ? Sounds like sheep dip bullshit to me. Both of them waste a lot of air on NSA surveillance capabilities (James Bamford exposed that in Puzzle Palace and other books decades ago) and .mil wrongdoing but nothing about Cocaine Import Agency.That e mail looks like a limited hang-out CYA. Nothing new and using shopworn script that doesn’t ring true on a message between stone cold killers. They deliberately left the Ambassador out to dry. Rumor has it he was ‘going native’ – Lawrence of Arabia wanna be style .They covered up Pearl Harbour, Tonkin and the USS Liberty for decades but internet speeds things up. Still have a hard time feeling pity for said Ambassador as he was seeding ISIS in Syria with wackos from Quaddafi’s jails and weapons form his arsenals. He was pictured posing by Quaddafi’s body . Play with vipers and all.. The other men killed there were brave I am sure but again WTF are you doing in a CIA ‘annex?’ Transport of Jihadis to Syria provided by the helpful Saudi Air Force transports and weapons on willing Turkish merchant marine. It didn’t work anyway since Assad got some Russian air on speed dial despite DC using US ‘assets’ as human shields to cockblock the Russians until Trump came along.
Your suspicions are correct. Snowden leaked nothing except the names of specific programs and how they route the data.
Which is basically Useless information for 99.99 of people. Assange is also another false god of the left.
Both of those assets are just distractions.
Assange is a loser who has 6 kids he doesn’t take care of. He is a front man for Israeli intelligence burning former assets who get wise to the fact they were working for Mossad, Unit 8200, or Talpiot.
And Snowden is an invented hero to cover up the Scott Bennett revelations.
They killed Michael Hastings to cover up the Bennett story.
Snowden is a communist and Assange is basically retarded.
Snowden never mentions his co-worker Bennett. Never. Not once. Why?
Bennett is a Hero. Period. The hero you NEVER heard of.
Snowden also never mentions what him, Bennett, and Birkenfeld found at UBS aka Union Bank of Switzerland.
The same UBS who was just caught working in China with the CCP to move money in and out of free nations and corporate entities.
Guess who put it all together 5 years later and blew it out of the water? This guy.
ISI, Qatar, Israel, NFL, UBS, the CCP, Democrats, and Covington and Burling law firm working with the DOJ in Project “Deep Black” to run drugs into our schools to finance their black op adventures in the Middle East.
Plus the CAIR front group “Arab Center”. Run by guess who… Huma’s mother.
Think Operation Northwoods, but for 2011. And run exclusively by Commies, Islam, CCP, and Democrats. No whites allowed.
This is all coming out very soon. Or will be handled quietly. I was told it’s coming out very soon.
It’s about as James Bond or Jason Bourne as you can get. Literally. I would say this is the craziest story in the last 20 years. Minus the Virus and the Election. It’s at least top 5.
Why do you think they didn’t stop the Arab Spring in Bengazi?
Because Gaddafi was standing the in way. He didn’t want to be part of the Belt and Road. Neither did Assad or the Taliban.
Because our A-Hole leaders were/are working for Israel, China, Russia, and Arabia to pave the way for the Belt and Road initiative.
Most of the ISIS guys were freed from prison for… guess… SELLING DRUGS WITH QATAR, MORROCCO, SAUDI, ISRAEL, RUSSIA, CHINA. And Deep Black was the DOJ corruption and drug dealing campaign run by Eric Holder and friends to bring them into the U.S.
This is why Holder stepped down. Fast and Furious was the cover story for this story. Same as Snowden.
Assange himself was a product of a weird MK Ultra cult run by some madame in Melbourne. He plopped right into the ’80s Hamburg hacking scene. There was some shenanigans with NATO intel ‘lost’ to GRU or KGB which led to one of his hacker partners being found ritually slaughtered in a forest outside Hamburg. You are right, Switzerland is going to be front and center soon . The castle dwellers are feeling the heat hence their mad orders to their minions like Shwab and Gates.
A few thoughts to share…
The shame of what happened in Benghazi started way before September 11, 2012…
The Half-War is the moniker given to the action in Libya.
The US led from behind in support of France and the UK et al.
At the time, in the eyes of Western Leaders (read Globalists), Quaddafi’s major sin wasn’t sponsoring terrorism, the Obama administration was doing that themselves. Quaddafi didn’t play well with others in the Globalist sandbox.
Quaddafi’s Libya had a monetary system that was backed by Gold when most others were propped up fiat currencies. (Where is Libya’s Gold today?)
Other than South Africa (using US, Russian & China’s money), Libya under Quaddafi was the most generous African country giving aid to other African countries.
Oil…we cant forget oil…Libya was one of the largest suppliers of oil to Europe south of the Alps.
Now lets talk weapons…After the fall of Quaddafi the country was awash in weapons…
We shipped said weapons to Syria in a manner mentioned in an earlier comment…enough said specifically about that.
These shipments were officially illegal but unofficially known to be occurring. Anyone ever wonder why the Gowdy Benghazi Report had no teeth…well when strategic members of the Senate and House had received unofficial (therefore compromising) briefings on the shipment of weapons to Syria how could the Report speak truth and lay open the compromise of fellow legislators…
Quaddafi’s Libya was an inconvenient Nation State…he didn’t play well with others (Globalists etc) as they were intent on pillaging the resources of the African continent from the oh so common Cleptocratic Leaders prevalent in the majority of other malleable African nations…
Quaddafi was flawed, proud and many other adjectives could apply. But Quaddafi and then Libya was inconvenient in the power plays of the day.
God Bless the Benghazi Four…I will forever pray we had been allowed to do something to save our Brothers.
Yup.
Qaddafi wasn’t the bad guy we were being told he was. He was just the target they were looking for.
After an admittedly rough start, Gaddafi had been made into a loyal client state of the US/UK, and was doing good yeoman’s work for them at the time of his demise.
Circa 2009, it was Gaddafi that was spearheading the US/UK’s long term ‘United States of the World’/’World Union’ project in Africa with his promotion of it’s continentilization via the ‘United States of Africa’/”African Union’ concept.
[The establishment of the United States of [North] America/[North] American Union in 1776 had been the first cog of the United States of the World project, and a model for the other continents of the world. Whether these continents be ‘Capitalist’ or ‘Communist’ in orientation being ultimately immaterial, as being part of a larger manufactured Hegelian dialectic these two closely paralleling corporate based ideologies are ultimately intended to ‘converge’/’synthesize’ with each other in global ‘Multi-culturalism’.]
Gaddafi’s loyalty and goid work wasn’t enough to save him, however, in the wake of the ‘Arab Spring’. He had to go. The US/UK promoted Arab identity/nationalism here by deliberately unleashing Islam via the sweeping away of authoritarian regimes such as Gadaffi’s, Saddam Hussein’s, etc, which had suppressed Islam. The reason being was to get Arab’s hope up with the rise of a ‘Caliphate’, and then to crush these same hopes.
Something not dissimilar had happened in Europe with the 1920’s – 30’s fostering of the rise of nationalism/identity in Europe by the US/UK (see A Sutton’s writing regarding National Socialist Germany and the US/IK) , albeit imperfectly expressed to be sure (what is perfect?) only to have these hopes crushed in WWII.
This is all part of the larger anti-identity effort aimed at the peoples of the world, whatever their core identity, good or bad, or, more likely, a mix of the same, may be.
From the Lusaks Times circa 2009….
‘Libyan President Colonel Muhammad Gaddafi has vowed to pursue his vision of a United States of Africa.’
‘Addressing the 12th Session of the Assembly of the African Union last night in his inaugural address as the new chairman of the African Union, Col. Gaddafi said he would continue to push African countries work towards the achievement of the United States of Africa.’
https://www.lusakatimes.com/2009/02/03/gaddafi-to-pursue-united-states-of-africa-vision/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7864604.stm
4.5