Naomi Wolf: The Return Trip to Fascism


Naomi Wolf, journalist and author of The End of America, gives insight on where we are down the road of tyranny. It ain’t a pretty picture.

Spread the love
                

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the Author: NC Scout

NC Scout is the nom de guerre of a former Infantry Scout and Sergeant in one of the Army’s best Reconnaissance Units. He has combat tours in both Iraq and Afghanistan. He teaches a series of courses focusing on small unit skills rarely if ever taught anywhere else in the prepping and survival field, including his RTO Course which focuses on small unit communications. In his free time he is an avid hunter, bushcrafter, writer, long range shooter, prepper, amateur radio operator and Libertarian activist. He can be contacted at [email protected] or via his blog at brushbeater.wordpress.com .

23 Comments

  1. Rooster March 18, 2021 at 08:25

    Super sharp Lady right there….thanks for posting AP
    R

  2. Chris March 18, 2021 at 10:39

    My only criticism as of the 26 min mark is her comment “tyrants on the right and left.” Right wing tyranny is an oxymoron. Hitler, Mussolini. Pol Pot, Mao, Tito, Stalin, Marx, Franco were all leftists. Collectivists. Pinochet in Argentina may have been benign and even beneficial to the well-being of Argentinians, but he was not a right-winger in the style of our Founding Fathers. He made decisions on behalf of the nation, and enforced them. They may have been good decisions, but they did not arise from a right-wing political philosophy. The right-left divide has been hidden from us since WWII.

    • NC Scout March 18, 2021 at 10:49

      The figures you named absolutely were not all ‘leftists.’
      The whole “collectivist” vs “individualist” nonsense is hideously ignorant of literally the entirety of history. But the argument, and it’s roots, were framed that way for a reason. And you bought it lock & stock, wondering why nothing gets accomplished.
      Those who do organize are running circles around “individuals.”

      • qwchrbichn March 19, 2021 at 03:21

        I’d like to see a brief explanation of how the aforementioned figures weren’t all Leftists, or how the individualist vs. collectivist distinction is both non-descriptive and pointless. When it comes to political theory and history, I’m certainly not coming in with an empty tank, but I’m open to new information.

        • NC Scout March 19, 2021 at 05:07

          Brief explanation:
          Right Wing: Conserves Nation. Comes from the French Monarchist Party. There is no such thing as a nation of “individuals”.
          Left Wing: Destroys nation through overthrow in favor of the liberation of the “individual”. Defines self through so-called voluntary interaction and association. Seeks to remove all bonds of “oppression”, including national borders. Workers of the World, Unite!
          Marx wrote quite a bit about it. As did his forebears, especially Hegel. Since no so-called AnCap writer (or even most Libertarians for that matter) even give lip service to these roots, this is why they remain irrelevant.

          • qwchrbichn March 19, 2021 at 12:49

            Conserving a nation is not exclusive to the Right by any means. You’ll see strong nationalist sentiment among any of the Asian communists. The “international socialism” of the Soviets was simply a repackaged form of Russian nationalism. Even reading Engels looks like a strategic cultural blueprint that inspired Hitler.
            When people talk about “individualism”, they’re not saying a “nation of individuals”, they’re talking about a system built on a respect for individual rights. Obviously the monarchists were the right in France, as they were at the founding of the former U.S. But, like today, the Right and Left in Europe were different than here. The Left in France were the proto commies back in the day. You wouldn’t say the same about the founders of the former US.
            Sure, the Leftwing lunatics wrote a lot about the liberation of the individual, but the actual administration of the State has absolutely nothing to do with liberation. The idea is as silly as anarcho-syndicalists thinking they’re actual anarchists. They’re collectivists all the way around. Sure the individual is liberated, just as long as they work the jobs we tell them and say all the right things. There is no room for free and fair elections in their worldview (seems familiar). It’s not like the USSR was actually made up of anything resembling legitimate republics. They wrote a whole bunch of self-contradictory nonsense, which is what leads to regurgitated crap like “True communism has never been tried.”

          • NC Scout March 19, 2021 at 13:03

            Your summation of the Russian system is wrong. They changed, and only slightly so, to make conscription for WWII (The Great Patriotic War) more agreeable.
            The Workers of the World quip was never abandoned.
            Further, either individualism is or is not the assertion of the individual in the face of a larger collective action. History and formal philosophy asserts it is; I concur.
            You are suggesting that Right Wing Nationalism is somehow a Leftist machination. This is entirely wrong.
            In practical terms, there has never been a movement of “individuals” that has accomplished a single thing. None.

          • qwchrbichn March 20, 2021 at 00:59

            Workers of the World was hardly anything more than a trite phrase, and certainly not a comprehensive philosophy that reflected some sort of altruistic dedication to internationalism. Pure marketing. There’s a reason so much communist propaganda and art looks and/or functions the same and always has, and it’s not because commies have somehow discovered some sort of universal form of expression. Besides, any cursory reading of the Russian political theorists who developed Soviet ideology should dislodge this superficial idea.
            Individualism is hardly some sort of reductive either/or proposition. Even if you try to relegate it to a non-existent monolithic “formal philosophy”, which I did not. I gave a specific legal context, which formed a major cultural underpinning of the former US for centuries.
            I did not “suggest” that “right wing nationalism” is a “leftist machination”. I said it wasn’t exclusive to the Left and provided examples. There is a significant difference between what I clearly stated and how you tried to reframe it. Unless of course you want to categorize Engels as a Right Wing luminary.

          • NC Scout March 20, 2021 at 07:26

            You literally said the Right wing Nationalists mentioned were Leftists. This was proven wrong.
            No time for circularity.

          • Mark. March 21, 2021 at 14:01

            Marx used the cover of individualism to advocate for total state power, and that is what leftists are doing today. None of that has anything to do with the concept of liberty or good governance as advanced by Cicero, and others who have followed in that tradition. Individual liberty and the proposition that rights come from God is a cornerstone of Western Civilization. Nothing with these beliefs suggests that we can’t voluntarily organize to throw off tyranny, as the Greeks did in repelling Persia, or as the colonists did in throwing off Britian.

          • NC Scout March 22, 2021 at 06:32

            No, Marx absolutely did not. You’ve obviously never read any of his work.
            What he advocated ended up that way, because it always does.
            The mass ignorance of the root of the question is exactly why the Left remains unanswered and unabated in America.

    • boss21 March 18, 2021 at 11:34

      Pinochet was Chile. If the vaccine/virus mutation stories are true this whole thing is academic.

  3. G.Patton1945 March 18, 2021 at 11:43

    How can I put this gently? Do just a bit of research on Naomi Wolf, even just read the first couple sections about Wolf on wikipedia ((( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Wolf ))), and then reflect on whether you want someone of this kind to influence you at all. Ask yourself how her and her kind would want to mislead us, half-truths being a specialty.

    • NC Scout March 18, 2021 at 11:44

      I understand and recognize her background. Dispute what she said.

      • G.Patton1945 March 18, 2021 at 15:59

        She said many good-sounding things — most of which were not sincere. Her name is “Wolf.” When the wolves are in full control, a designated few wolves in sheep’s masks can go give speeches to the sheep saying there are a “few bad actors” to blame and that the sheep should remain pacifist, allow non-sheep immigration, and vote their way to heaven.
        Naomi Wolf said she is “anti-racist” and “pro-immigration” and re-emphasized these statements. These are code phrases for being anti-White. Ask her who are the “evil racists” in the USA, and she will say, as she has in the past, that Whites are. By her not identifying the race of the “few bad actors” she repeatedly said are responsible, she leaves our unknowing masses to automatically fill in the blank with “Whites.” She sits there pretending to be White! Ask her if White people founded and populated her precious Israel. If honest for a moment, she will reply, “Of course not. Jews founded and populated Israel.”
        We must ask: What does she NOT say? What lies by omission? She does not identify “the few bad actors” by race. She cited Bill Gates, “big tech,” pharma, and lying media. Well, a good look at Bill Gates’ ancestry shows he is one of her kind. And “big tech” owners, including Bill Gates, are members of her kind. And the media are owned by her kind. The CEOs of the poison-vaccine makers are all of her kind.
        Also, she did NOT say that the “pandemic” is a scamdemic. She supports the virus lie. The truth is that there is no such virus. The U.S. govt and U.K. govt admitted very quietly last year that they had no isolated and purified sample of it. It would be required to have samples as proof for honest scientists to scrutinize BEFORE declaring “emergencies” and tyrannical unConstitutional lockdowns. Covid-19 is all lies. Enemies and fools talk like nobody died before “covid” came along.
        She spoke for an hour. A full response would take an hour, as my points have to be explained and provided with evidence in order to have a chance at persuading people who have no knowledge — yet — of these things.
        Let me conclude with a mention of two of our great men who knew very well, and who wrote and talked the truth. And we all should have been taught their writings in school. The great Henry Ford, inventor and automaker, published 100 years ago his newspaper articles and book on her kind, but 95% of our people know nothing about it. At the end of WW2, Gen. George Patton wrote in his diary, wrote to his wife, and told some fellow officers and politicians about the truth he had belatedly realized. He said we had killed the wrong enemy, and he was going to take action. And then he was killed, December 1945.
        We have a full treasure of knowledge on all this. We don’t need a Naomi Wolf or any of her kind to give us some truth — mixed with half-truths and with the key facts withheld. This delays our victory. We need to spread the verified knowledge we already have.
        NC Scout, when we add your great military knowledge to that knowledge, we will win. We will kill the right enemy this time. And we will ensure that our people never again drop their guard, never again descend into fatal ignorance and suicidal pacifism.

        • NC Scout March 18, 2021 at 17:05

          You have not disputed the veracity of literally anything she said.

  4. Luke March 18, 2021 at 13:53

    Awesome video, the lady is progressive she admits and I bet so is her audience. We need people like this on Team America. It’s simple we fight back now and we will be isolated and destroyed IMHO. We need apolitical types to think us as hero’s not terrorists. Before someone says they don’t care you will if you ever need medical care. It will be very challenging into move amongst the sheep but a whole lot easier if they allow you passage.
    Sent this to my lib gf. She watched 5min of it was impressed. Will get her to watch the whole thing. All I he other shit I show her falls on deaf ears. Been working on her for a while have all but given up. It’s been a cause for many a fight too lol. She’s not what you would consider crazy left either as we share many common thoughts. And Naomi is correct this war is the World vs The Elitists of the World. And it will be fought here in America because we are the only one left that is big enough to make a difference and is still armed.

  5. Paulo March 18, 2021 at 23:24

    Watched Naomi Wolf interview, thank you for sharing.
    This interview of Julie Kelly ( think she writes for AmericanGreatness ), is quite lengthy, and worth the time
    to watch in whole or in parts, depending on your time restrictions:
    https://www.pscp.tv/w/1OyKAEdbQANKb
    “Every man to his family and his possessions”

    • NC Scout March 18, 2021 at 23:45

      Nice, thanks brother.

  6. Anonymous March 20, 2021 at 06:31

    4.5

  7. Anonymous March 20, 2021 at 13:21

    5

  8. Stanwyck March 22, 2021 at 13:15

    Very good interview. Only thing I disagree with is the end when she is talking about the nation state and is hyper cautious in regards to making sure her ideas are not viewed as racists and states that the leaders of the nation state movement in Europe tend to be racist. Not true. Her ideals are being broken down before her and she has yet to accept that it is NOT racists for Germans, French, Spain, British to want a country for Germans, French, Spain, and British and they don’t have to be “inclusive” and let others in and give them a path to citizenship. I believe Israel is very strict about who gets to live in Israel. Part of the reason we are in this mess is because the powers that be wanted to mix the races therefore destroying their sovereignty, identity and weaken them.

  9. Kevin April 12, 2021 at 14:41

    Everything; and I mean everything, requires a grain of salt these days. We are being played by both sides [there may be more than two] to some degree. I’m suspicious of most all of these ‘consultants’

Comments are closed.

GUNS N GEAR

Categories

Archives

Spread the love