CDR Salamander: Kaplan’s ‘Elegant Decline’ at 15
Back in the November 2007 issue of The Atlantic, Robert D. Kaplan published an essay that still comes to mind on a regular basis a decade and a half after its publication; America’s Elegant Decline. I first mentioned it ten months after its publication while I was in Afghanistan, and then only briefly.
At 15, I think it is time to see how it holds up.
15 years is a long time – but it also passes quickly. 15 years from now would be January of 2038. You know all that talk about “2040” in the last year, well you’re one POM cycle away … and while some things we think about the future to come will be roughly correct, some will be quite off. That is normal and should be expected. With that benchmark in place, Elegant Decline holds up pretty well.
Before we dive in, let’s remember the time and place of 2007. Obama was still the junior Senator from Illinois. The surge in Iraq was almost at its peak and at the time success was iffy. Though we knew at CENTCOM in mid-Summer of 2007 that NATO culminated in Afghanistan and the USA would have to step in soon as we could, in general Afghanistan – the good war – was seen as in good hands with NATO.
Though the cheap seats were warning otherwise, the Navy let everyone know of the glories of Transformation embodied by LCS, DDG-1000 and CG(X) were going to bring if everyone would just shut up and color … a period that would end 18-months after Elegant Decline with the truncating to 3-ships of the Zumwalt class … and you know the rest as we rolled in to the Age of Salamander to prepare everyone for The Terrible 20s.
So, in to that moment Kaplan dedicates the first third of his article reminding everyone of some truths are were as correct in 2007 as they are in 2023;
Beware pendulum swings. Before 9/11, not enough U.S. generals believed that the future of war was unconventional and tied to global anarchy. … Now the Pentagon is consumed by a focus on urban warfare and counterinsurgency; … But have we pushed it too far? We may finally master the art of counterinsurgency just in time for it to recede in importance.
…Though counterinsurgency will remain a core part of our military doctrine, the Pentagon does not have the luxury of planning for one military future; it must plan for several.
“Regular wars” between major states could be as frequent in the 21st century as they were in the 20th. … these future wars will not require any “manifestation of insanity by political leaders,” nor even an “aberration from normal statecraft, ” but may come about merely because of what Thucydides recognized as “fear, honour, and interest.”
..
The current catchphrase is boots on the ground; in the future it could be hulls in the water.
…
A “peaceful, gain-loving nation” like the United States “is not far-sighted, and far-sightedness is needed for adequate military preparation, especially in these days,” warned Navy Captain Alfred Thayer Mahan in 1890..
This is when he transitions to what he, rightfully, sees as a primary indicator of America’s decline – its Navy – something that dominates the other 2/3 of the article.
…too few strategists at the time were thinking seriously about sea power. Today we are similarly obsessed with dirty land wars, and our 300-ship Navy is roughly half the size it was in the mid-1980s.
A great navy is like oxygen: You notice it only when it is gone. But the strength of a nation’s sea presence, more than any other indicator, has throughout history often been the best barometer of that nation’s power and prospects.
I just wanted to take a note to nod at the hard work led by Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-WI) in the changes to Section 8062(a) of USC Title 10, 15-years after Elegant Decline, to put this in to law.
Our friend Bryan McGrath has a superb summary of the changes and their importance here.
Back to Elegant Decline – where Kaplan does a great job outlining more nuggets of unalloyed truths;
Our sea power allows us to lose a limited war…Army units can’t forward-deploy anywhere in significant numbers without a national debate. Not so the Navy. … Great navies help preserve international stability.
…
In an age where 90 percent of global commerce travels by sea, and 95 percent of our imports and exports from outside North American do the same (even as that trade volume is set to double by 2020), and when 75 percent of the world’s population is clustered within 200 miles of the sea, the relative decline of our Navy is a big, dangerous fact to which our elites appear blind.
Well, it didn’t double, but it did go up by 30%.