Watch: Ex-Sniper Details Jaw-Dropping Problem About Trump Assassination Attempt
Former military sniper Nick Irving has raised alarming questions about the recent assassination attempt on Donald Trump, pointing to what he describes as glaring security failures.
He also worries that another assassination is imminent, given the lack of concrete information from officials regarding what exactly happened, paired with zero known steps about how to prevent a new threat to the president’s life in the future.
Irving, known for his 33 confirmed kills during his service, didn’t mince words as he dissected the events surrounding the incident.
The attempted assassination, which sent shockwaves through the political landscape, has now come under intense scrutiny from security experts.
Irving’s analysis paints a picture of a Secret Service operation riddled with potential oversights and questionable decisions.
“It just seems like I don’t want to be like a conspiracy theorist. But it almost feels like it was a setup at this point. There was so much, you know, failures from a top down,” Irving stated, his voice tinged with disbelief.
When asked about the likelihood of another assassination attempt “between now and Election Day,” Irving responded that he’s “almost certain” it will happen again.
“The political atmosphere right now. You can almost feel it. It’s so thick in the air,” he said, touching on heightened tensions.
The former sniper’s comments have ignited a firestorm of speculation about the competence of those tasked with protecting high-profile political figures.
Irving’s military background lends weight to his observations, particularly when it comes to tactical oversights.
One of the most glaring issues, according to Irving, was the lack of attention paid to elevated positions around the event site.
He pointed out, “It was day one when we found out that the 20 year old kid climbed up on the rooftop… That was like a big sign for me that, you know, why was a counter sniper team not having eyes on a vantage point like that? The high ground, that’s like military 101.”
This basic tactical error, as Irving sees it, raises serious questions about the preparedness and training of the security detail.
The fact that a young individual could access such a strategically important location undetected has sent ripples of concern throughout the internet and security circles.
Irving’s critique extends beyond just the ground-level operatives. He suggests that the failures may stem from higher up the chain of command, hinting at a systemic problem within the organization tasked with protecting political figures.
These sentiments were also recently echoed by another former sniper who speculated the public did not have the full story about the Trump shooter, alleging a conspiracy.
Irving’s recommendations for improvement are clear and decisive. He advocates for a rigorous vetting process for security personnel and suggests bringing in top-tier snipers to bolster protective measures.
These steps, Irving argues, are crucial in light of the current political climate, which he views as particularly volatile.
The assassination attempt has brought the issue of political violence to the forefront of national discourse.
Irving’s comments underscore the urgent need for a comprehensive review of security protocols, especially for high-profile political figures like Trump.
As the investigation into the incident continues, Irving’s insights offer a unique perspective from someone well-versed in tactical operations.
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
About the Author: Patriotman
4 Comments
Comments are closed.
GUNS N GEAR
Why do we not hear from an acoustics expert about three different guns as part of the assassination attempt?
There is considerable private investigative work being done on the acoustics and the available video, it is just not being done by the Fibs or anyone else in LE. The Fibs hosed down the rooftop with a fire hose the day of the shooting and the entire rally site was empty the next day according to curious locals who went there and videoed the non-activity. The bleachers and everything else in the impact area around the stage were all removed. This studied lack of investigative curiosity is telling.
The collaboration of people looking at this have slowed down the audio from various samples taken that day and claim they have isolated suppressed shots before and after the audible shooting. They also have investigated an apparent suppressed shot taken at SNOT team A which missed them and then passed down the upper row of the angled right side bleacher and impacted on the railing. The popping off of the scope and the ducking by the prone sniper were likely them reacting to being shot at. Several people in that top row bleacher all flinched and jumped in sequence as the bullet passed by. Video shows that 2 snipers immediately reorienting toward the trees to the right of the water tower and away from where Crooks was. I will not get into the whole case they make, but is is convincing to me, and no less an authority then Clay Martin,, a former USMC Scout Sniper and Army SF vet sat through the whole 2 plus hours of analysis they presented and agreed with nearly all of it. Martin is certain he is hearing suppressed .300 Blackout.
Beyond what these guys are alleging, it is curious that the USSS is making a big deal about the fact that they provided multiple SS counter sniper teams to Trumps detail for this rally when he had been allocated none at all for the last few years. The true purpose of this sudden surge of snipers was probably to ensure that Crooks was killed and the “lone nut” narrative could be nailed down. This also brings up the question as to why anyone in Law Enforcement would need to have a suppressed sniper rifle and/or .300 Blackout? It should not be allowed for Security/LE use under any circumstances. The possibility that there was a suppressed firefight between the SNOT teams and unknown shooters aside from the “official” 10 rounds that everyone heard should make this reasoning crystal clear.
Dan Bongino, former USSS, has been ripping them to shreds saying the same things, since it happened. Very informative about the USSS inner workings.
What are we waiting for? Could there be any more clear indication that The Enemy is in control of fed.gov? And with the express intention of destroying the social, governmental and economic institutions of our country, toward the object of unassailable and perpetual control?
We will each have to reach a very personal decision, giving ourselves permission to accept responsibility to act. It’s not going to come from anywhere else.