Scientists from Western MI University pushing plan to unleash tick born diseases on population
Scientists from Western Michigan University are pushing a plan to supposedly “fight climate change” that involves deliberately spreading a dangerous tick-borne disease that can trigger a lifelong fatal allergy to red meat. 🥩
As part of a plan to ensure that the United States… pic.twitter.com/fBWUynOOFe
— “Sudden And Unexpected” (@toobaffled) August 12, 2025
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
About the Author: NC Scout
NC Scout is the nom de guerre of a former Infantry Scout and Sergeant in one of the Army’s best Reconnaissance Units. He has combat tours in both Iraq and Afghanistan. He teaches a series of courses focusing on small unit skills rarely if ever taught anywhere else in the prepping and survival field, including his RTO Course which focuses on small unit communications. In his free time he is an avid hunter, bushcrafter, writer, long range shooter, prepper, amateur radio operator and Libertarian activist. He can be contacted at [email protected] or via his blog at brushbeater.wordpress.com .
4 Comments
Comments are closed.
GUNS N GEAR
Could this be classified as bio terrorism, and should it be prosecuted if they go any further than the concept as a thesis paper. In my opinion yes 100% to both of these ideas.
Bowing before the altar of “Climate Change” for yourself is acceptable, forcing your religion on the rest of society should be heavily discouraged.
Any funding provided should be pulled immediately.
I agree 100%.
Here’s a book Crutchfield (one of the authors of this paper) wrote:
Moral Enhancement and the Public Good
Routledge. 2021.
Currently, humans lack the cognitive and moral capacities to prevent the widespread suffering associated with collective risks, like pandemics, climate change, or even asteroids. In Moral Enhancement and the Public Good, Parker Crutchfield argues for the controversial, and initially counterintuitive claim that everyone should be administered a substance that makes us better people. Furthermore, he argues that it should be administered without our knowledge. That is, moral bioenhancement should be both compulsory and covert. Crutchfield demonstrates how our duty to future generations and our epistemic inability to promote the public good highlight the need for compulsory, covert moral bioenhancement. This not only gives us the best chance of preventing widespread suffering, compared to other interventions (or doing nothing), it also best promotes liberty, autonomy, and equality. In a final chapter, Crutchfield addresses the most salient objections to his argument.
All these self stuffed, arrogant, do gooder “altruists” should by given their own “treatment,” publicly and with whatever force required.
I assume that alpha gal is the tick borne illness he’s suggesting, since it causes the inability to ingest red meat without many very difficult side effects. I personally know several women, including my wife, who are so afflicted. I would be happy to administer this biological weapon to this tyrannical professor of poison.
From that above:
” In Moral Enhancement and the Public Good, Parker Crutchfield argues for the controversial, and initially counterintuitive claim that everyone should be administered a substance that makes us better people. Furthermore, he argues that it should be administered without our knowledge.”
I suppose that he would consider that to be a “greater good” than, say, the administration, both covert and forced, if the massive poisoning of the world through the air, water, food, soil and “medicine that we are currently being subjected to.
Want to improve humanity? Identify and eliminate the genes for psychopathy, sociopathy and toxic narcissism. Kill those types who exist to torture unsuspecting humanity presently. Start with Crutchfield.