Creating a Nuclear Detonation Scenario Handbook – Part One

With all the talk about Russia, Ukraine, and the resurgence of the thread of nuclear war – which, given the development of variable-yield nukes, is not are far-fetched as you may think (though still unlikely) – I began to put together a binder that had possible targets that Russia or China might want to hit and began to use the Nuke Map that Don Shift referred to in his recent article about Aboveground Fallout Protection. My thought process is that this is sort of a one and done project. Unlike an area study, which should be updated fairly regularly, there is a good chance that the changes you would need to make to this document are infrequent and minor. The document doesn’t have to go over ALL possible outcomes – just a middle of the road scenario you can then estimate off of depending on actual events.

To determine the potential targets, I looked at old maps of Soviet targets to determine what they wanted to hit as well as newspaper articles, expert analysis, and my own critical thinking of what infrastructure would be important to hit.

For obvious reasons, I am not going to post my own binder information as it would reveal my AO, but I did create a sample one as an example. Will you ever need this information? Probably not. Is it still an informative project you should do? Yes.

In this example, I used Fort Bragg. The model assumes a blast optimized for 5 psi, a 15mph SW wind, and other factors you can customize within the model itself. These are just the default settings. I also assumed an 800kt blast from a Russian SS-25 TOPOL. My entry would look something like this. I include a brief description of the site – units housed (if military), flight information (if an airport), generation output (if a nuclear power plant).

In Part Two, I am going to show you the resources I added to the reference section (with the original links, so you can peruse the source information yourself).

Fort Bragg – Fayetteville, North Carolina

Units Housed

  • XVIII Airborne Corps:
  • United States Army Special Operations Command:
  • Other Army units on base:
    • United States Army Reserve Command
    • United States Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command
    • 1st Battalion, 313th Regiment (Logistics Support Battalion)
    • B Company, 249th Engineer Battalion (Prime Power)
    • Airborne and Special Operations Test Directorate
  • Units at Simmons Army Airfield:
    • 82nd Aviation Regiment
  • Units at Pope Field:
    • 18th Air Support Operations Group
    • 11th Special Operations Intelligence Squadron
    • 14th Air Support Operations Squadron
    • 24th Special Tactics Squadron
    • 43d Air Mobility Operations Group
    • Joint Special Operations Command
    • 2nd Security Force Assistance Brigade (2nd SFAB)

AIR BURST                                                                     SURFACE BURST

Fatalities: 27,720                                                             Fatalities: 18,050

Injuries: 96,320                                                                Injuries: 32,760

AVG/24hr: 289,646                                                          AVG/24hr: 113,829

Air Burst

Surface Blast

 

 

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the Author: Patriotman

Patriotman currently ekes out a survivalist lifestyle in a suburban northeastern state as best as he can. He has varied experience in political science, public policy, biological sciences, and higher education. Proudly Catholic and an Eagle Scout, he has no military experience and thus offers a relatable perspective for the average suburban prepper who is preparing for troubled times on the horizon with less than ideal teams and in less than ideal locations. Brushbeater Store Page: http://bit.ly/BrushbeaterStore

9 Comments

  1. American Yeoman January 27, 2022 at 14:20

    Did this as part of my Area Study many years ago.

    • Patriotman January 27, 2022 at 14:31

      Why am I not surprised since you are always on top of things? :)

  2. MTHead January 27, 2022 at 14:30

    What do you think the chances of them using thermo-barics instead of nukes? Haven’t they pushed the envelope on those to equal nukes? Without the radiation?
    Not sure of size and delivery vehicles might make them impractical? Just wondering, as we know China would love to move in and set up shop afterward.

  3. Don Shift January 27, 2022 at 19:04

    Remember that when you pick targets, you’re picking the worst case scenario targets. You’ll probably overestimate what gets hit. Each side has like 1500 active warheads (if they’re honest) which means probably about 1000 are on missiles. Not all of them will fly at once because a second strike needs to be reserved against whoever or a third party (cough cough China). China might get off 250-300 where as Russia could probably do counter-force against silos and bomber bases with 750.

    That means that smaller, less likely targets are probably going to escape. So Ft. Bragg? Bye. Camp Mackall? Probably not. That’s a good thing, but don’t gamble on a “limited exchange.”

    Incidentally where I grew up we had an ADC base in town. Probably not an ICBM target but bombers might have wiped us off the map. House up the street has a fallout shelter. Wonder if they’re cleaning it out now?

    • Patriotman January 27, 2022 at 21:47

      True. I only looked at a handful of targets near me because I assume all the population centers north of me are done so I only went with other locations that were near me

      • Don Shift January 27, 2022 at 23:11

        I’m just trying to be reassuring. And the big east coast cities? For sure they’re gone. Lots of other stuff around there that might get it as well. You never know until you look.

  4. mike January 27, 2022 at 20:47

    Some thoughts: Most target maps I have seen in the last 45 years seem to be outdated to an extent or missing what I would think would be a certain target. For example, this map is quite good, but unless it is part of the cluster of targets lumped in the greater Boston Area, The Pave Paws Radar site on Cape Cod would appear to have been overlooked. If I were worried about it I would just assume it would be hit. It does raise the question about whether or not Russian doctrine entertains the possibility of hitting smaller, unhardened targets like that with conventional armed cruise missiles as part of a larger nuclear attack. It makes one wonder if the national command authority has a doctrine or has even contemplated widespread conventional attack on strategic targets in CONUS if engaged in a limited war in or near the homeland of a peer enemy. I wouldn’t be surprised if they have not on the presumption that our automatic response would be nuclear and therefore nobody would dare do it.

    • Patriotman January 27, 2022 at 21:45

      They are absolutely outdated to a degree. I used then to get an idea of what they would target and went from there.

Comments are closed.

GUNS N GEAR

Categories

Archives