Problems with the ‘Dirty Bomb’ Narrative, by NC Scout

(NC Scout / American Partisan) Christopher Wray, Director of the FBI, has now pointed out in a piece done by the Washington Examiner that there’s not just been angry calls against the DOJ and FBI specifically but that those threats are becoming more specific, mentioning the term ‘dirty bomb’. That in and of itself is quite interesting.

FBI warns of threats of ‘civil war,’ ‘dirty bomb’ following Trump raidhttps://t.co/WLbYHOPFAG pic.twitter.com/ySFm5sCnc9

— The Washington Times (@WashTimes) August 16, 2022

A dirty bomb is a low-grade weapon of mass destruction designed to spread radioactive material rather than the all out drama of of a full scale nuclear detonation. They’ve been in the public parlance since at least 2001 and was even the major plot device in George Clooney’s terrible late 90s action movie, The Peacemaker. Like that dumpster fire, everything in DC is also fantasy land, with a cursory preview to the coming attractions playing out before your very eyes.

The term dirty bomb is quite a specific one, requiring much on part of a group to pull such a thing off. First you’d need to acquire some sort of radiological material, and unlike the first 30 minutes of Back to the Future, its not exactly an easy task. Having knowledge of such things is tightly controlled here in the US, whether people realize it or not, and nuclear engineering and access programs are fairly selective on exactly who they let in, replete with a DOE pre-screening. So one would be justified in assuming that they’d have a list of potential dissidents with such a working knowledge necessary. Right?

Following the FBI raid on President Trump’s estate last week, and the suggestion that Trump could be indicted under the Espionage Act, an MSNBC panel claimed that Trump could be “trafficking” nuclear secrets to Vladimir Putin or Saudi Arabia.https://t.co/ORskjTwdSM

— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) August 15, 2022

Let’s re-examine the media-spun narrative regarding the politicized raid on Mar-a-Lago. Their justification? Nuclear secrets. Of course the public cannot know specifically what those may be, leaving an open-ended interpretation to have the blanks filled in later. Dirty bombs certainly fit into the nuclear category.

New York City released a PSA preparing residents for a nuclear attack 👀🤯 pic.twitter.com/kFNp9QQtY5

— NowThis (@nowthisnews) July 14, 2022

Then of course we have the curious case of the NYC nuclear attack public service announcements, hastily greenscreened and coming off looking like a lower-rent version of Sesame Street. Why would they, and only they, launch such a PSA without some much as a public justification? If there’s a genuine threat, tell us. You have the burden of proof to ensure the public trust. Like a turtle on a post someone put it there and for a reason – not unprompted. And an already stretched thin emergency response force would not seek to exacerbate an already fragile system. Right?

Not unless there was some tangible thing to be gained. We cannot let a good crisis go to waste, or so we’re told.

So, we have a case of a specific threat being termed, which would require a specific skillset and level of access in order to pull off. And unlike the DC fall action movie blockbuster they’re trying to sell the American people, the antagonists ain’t exactly angry eastern Euros with bad accents. Its the guys in suits who know they’ve exhausted any credibility they have with any American with a brain. That no matter how many diversions they try to pull its not winning them any favor, and that the gravy train may very well be up when they realize they can’t cheat in enough elections to keep populist candidates from winning. So what’s the next move?

They’ve created a narrative that the former President ‘may have kept nuclear secrets’ and somehow exchanged them with Russia, keeping with their previously debunked lies while also seizing his active passport and two expired ones – a crime unto itself and one that requires its own warrant to be lawfully executed. Of course lawful is a vague term to this crowd. But also keep in mind the MSM has spun this tale and are running with it in an attempt to lie enough times it becomes truth. And now the embattled FBI Director uses a specific term. It doesn’t take much brain power to put together ‘nuclear secrets’ and ‘dirty bomb’ when you’re desperately trying to turn the table on losing the public. How could it be pulled off? The question becomes who’d have unique access to create such a thing?

One person who would have such access is Sam Brinton. You know him, the dog guy who wears leashed dresses and could not pass an SF 86 audit to save his life. One look at the guy tells you he never, under any circumstances, should have been granted access to any special access programs let alone be in charge of the very things you’d need to build a dirty bomb. Unless of course you needed an easily compromised, easily manipulable stooge who genuinely hates half this country as he’s said in his commentary on ‘gay conversion therapy’. And he’s the one in charge of exactly what would be needed for a dirty bomb and would have zero moral objection to such a thing. That’s why he’s where he is. Quite convenient.

With the narrative laid, such an attack would be a last resort as a shock tactic against the American people. The introduction of a superordinate goal, replete with a convenient public enemy for the people to rally behind in their newly awakened national vigor against. Orange man really was bad, who knew? they’ll say. All his followers are evil too. Now pay your higher taxes and forget the crimes of the Bidens. Wave your Ukraine flag while you’re at it.

None of this is to say what might happen, however, when you take into account all of the oddities we’ve observed over the past few months with nothing fitting, now a more specific picture is becoming clear. You don’t get specific unless you have prior knowledge, and prior knowledge is exactly what they’ve got. But of what…that’s the question.