The CIA Thought Putin Would Quickly Conquer Ukraine. Why Did They Get It So Wrong?

Ever since Ukraine launched a successful counteroffensive against Russian forces in late August, American officials have tried to claim credit, insisting that U.S. intelligence has been key to Ukraine’s battlefield victories.

Yet U.S. officials have simultaneously downplayed their intelligence failures in Ukraine — especially their glaring mistakes at the outset of the war. When Putin invaded in February, U.S. intelligence officials told the White House that Russia would win in a matter of days by quickly overwhelming the Ukrainian army, according to current and former U.S. intelligence officials, who asked not to be named to discuss sensitive information.

The Central Intelligence Agency was so pessimistic about Ukraine’s chances that officials told President Joe Biden and other policymakers that the best they could expect was that the remnants of Ukraine’s defeated forces would mount an insurgency, a guerrilla war against the Russian occupiers. By the time of the February invasion, the CIA was already planning how to provide covert support for a Ukrainian insurgency following a Russian military victory, the officials said.

U.S. intelligence reports at the time predicted that Kyiv would fall quickly, perhaps in a week or two at the most. The predictions spurred the Biden administration to secretly withdraw some key U.S. intelligence assets from Ukraine, including covert former special operations personnel on contract with the CIA, the current and former officials said. Their account was backed up by a Naval officer and a former Navy SEAL, who were aware of the movements and who also asked not to be named because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

The CIA “got it completely wrong,” said one former senior U.S. intelligence official, who is knowledgeable about what the CIA was reporting when the Russian invasion began. “They thought Russia would win right away.”

When it became clear that the agency’s predictions of a rapid Russian victory had been wrong, the Biden administration sent the clandestine assets that had been pulled out of Ukraine back into the country, the military and intelligence officials said. One U.S. official insisted that the CIA only conducted a partial withdrawal of its assets when the war began, and that the agency “never completely left.”

Secret U.S. operations inside Ukraine are being conducted under a presidential covert action finding.

Yet clandestine American operations inside Ukraine are now far more extensive than they were early in the war, when U.S. intelligence officials were fearful that Russia would steamroll over the Ukrainian army. There is a much larger presence of both CIA and U.S. special operations personnel and resources in Ukraine than there were at the time of the Russian invasion in February, several current and former intelligence officials told The Intercept.

Secret U.S. operations inside Ukraine are being conducted under a presidential covert action finding, current and former officials said. The finding indicates that the president has quietly notified certain congressional leaders about the administration’s decision to conduct a broad program of clandestine operations inside the country. One former special forces officer said that Biden amended a preexisting finding, originally approved during the Obama administration, that was designed to counter malign foreign influence activities. A former CIA officer told The Intercept that Biden’s use of the preexisting finding has frustrated some intelligence officials, who believe that U.S. involvement in the Ukraine conflict differs so much from the spirit of the finding that it should merit a new one. A CIA spokesperson declined to comment about whether there is a presidential covert action finding for operations in Ukraine.

The U.S. intelligence community’s stunning failure at the beginning of the war to recognize the fundamental weaknesses in the Russian system mirrors its blindness to the military and economic weaknesses of the Soviet Union in the 1980s, when Washington failed to predict the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. While not all U.S. intelligence analysts underestimated the Ukrainian will to fight, the community’s missteps in Ukraine came just months after American intelligence gravely underestimated how fast the U.S.-backed government in Afghanistan would collapse in 2021, leading to a rapid takeover by the Taliban.

READ MORE HERE

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the Author: Patriotman

Patriotman currently ekes out a survivalist lifestyle in a suburban northeastern state as best as he can. He has varied experience in political science, public policy, biological sciences, and higher education. Proudly Catholic and an Eagle Scout, he has no military experience and thus offers a relatable perspective for the average suburban prepper who is preparing for troubled times on the horizon with less than ideal teams and in less than ideal locations. Brushbeater Store Page: http://bit.ly/BrushbeaterStore

6 Comments

  1. mike October 6, 2022 at 11:12

    Have they ever been right about anything? Suez Crisis 1956? Sputnik 1957? Cuba 59-62? Tet Offensive 1968? Six Day War 1967? Easter Offensive 1972? Yom Kippur War 1973 (This one almost went nuclear). RVN collapse 1975? Iranian Revolution 1978? Iranian Hostages1979? Invasion of Afghanistan 1979? Iraq Invasion of Iran 1981? Lebanon bombing 1983? Iraq Invasion of Kuwait 1990? Sept 11? That’s just the list off the top of my head. With an Intelligence service with a track record like that, we are better off without one at all.

  2. American Yeoman October 6, 2022 at 12:11

    Lots of folks THOUGHT- and claimed, all kinds of special insight etc…as to why it would be different than it has been. To be fair, it ain’t over yet either…..

  3. boss21 October 6, 2022 at 14:03

    It’s not an intelligence‘service’. It’s a OSS / secret society created abomination that should have been aborted. Intel gathering such as it is nowadays is the province of the military first and foremost. ‘Covert action under Presidential findings’ – what a crock of shit. When did we vote for that?
    The CIA and everyone including the Russians knew Ukraine wouldn’t fold that fast. They are fanatics who spent eight years digging in. The ones who will fold first are the Eurotards , which is the plan.

  4. no October 6, 2022 at 17:17

    The CIA under-estimated the Biden/Obama/Clinton involvement in Ukraine and thus also failed to predict that our rogue government would send 10s of billions of dollars and scads of black ops folks?

    No they didn’t. They provided narrative cover for the The Regime to do whatever it pleased to “defend Ukraine”.

    Can’t want to see what cover they laid down when definitive proof comes out that US blew up those pipelines.

  5. TheBidenCrimeFamilt October 6, 2022 at 17:20

    They even missed the collapse of the soviet union. Guess it is hard see with your head stuck where the sun don’t shine.

  6. Dollar_Milkshake_Theory October 6, 2022 at 19:34

    As I recall, there were 3 figureheads that stood in the way of the globalist wet dream. OrangeMan, Putin, and Jinping. One down…,With so much being invested in taking down number Two, with no end in sight, along with Two and Three teaming up, this ought to get real intersting.

Comments are closed.

GUNS N GEAR

Categories

Archives