If The FBI Had Informants On The Inside … How Do They Explain J6?

originally published on Clash Daily.

We have heard every possible explanation for the events of January 6th. But the holes in the story make it likely we have never gotten CLOSE to the whole story.

When Dems first pushed impeachment, it was specifically based on the claims that Trump had personally taken actions on that day that were somehow directly responsible for whipping that crowd into a frenzy that descended upon the Capitol.

We heard all kinds of wild accusations about zip ties and murdered police officers, painting scenarios of kidnapping and violence, despite a coroner having declared officer Sicknick dying of natural causes with zero evidence of head trauma, and the zip ties having belonged to Capitol Police, and were returned to authorities by one of the protesters inside who didn’t want to see them used in any inapproptriate way.

Then came a pivot to an organized assault on the Capitol in which various militia groups were going to descend for whatever heinous purpose we’re supposed to believe. That led to arrests, and even some convictions.

With those cases still pending, we’ve learned a lot about how the FBI handles cases. We’ve seen them infiltrate Bible Studies while trying to encourage people present to build a Molotov cocktail and test it on federal property. We’ve seen arrests made over someone owning a lego representation of the Capitol building (still in the box). We’ve seen signs of entrapment in the Gov. Whitmer ‘fednapping’ case, among other instances that came up in court cases.

FBI Director Christopher Wray continues to be cagey about whether or not the FBI had informants embedded within the J6 protesters.

On Tuesday, Congressman Clay Higgins (R-LA) asked Director Wray, “Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters inside The Capitol on January 6th prior to the doors being opened?”

Director Wray replied, “I have to be very careful about what I can say.”

MORE