National Guard Cybersecurity Units Activated in 14 States Ahead of Midterm Elections: Reports
Cybersecurity units from the National Guard will be activated in 14 U.S. states to help counter any threats to election officials’ networks ahead of, during, and after the upcoming Nov. 8 midterm elections, according to reports.
The 14 include battleground states Arizona, Iowa, and Pennsylvania, as well as Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, North Carolina, New Mexico, New York, Washington, and West Virginia, reported Politico.
Brig. Gen. Gent Welsh, the commander of the Washington Air National Guard, said at a virtual media briefing on Nov. 4 that not every state is doing it but states that are activating these units “have invested in cyber talent and cyber missions for years,” according to outlet Statescoop, which reports on technology-related news in government.
“If you don’t have a cyber unit in your state you’re not in a good position to help them protect elections,” Welsh said.
He added that the National Guard’s participation in election cybersecurity activities “does add an air of credibility to what’s out there,” noting that the National Guard “is still one of the most trusted institutions in the United States.”
‘As Secure Elections as Possible’
The plan comes after eight states received support from cyber units in the National Guard during the primary elections that took place earlier this year.
According to the outlets, there are 38 dedicated cyber units within the Air and Army National Guard across the United States that work to help state and local officials on cyber-related issues such as network assessments and risk mitigation. The cyber units collectively comprise over 2,200 personnel.
“Our goal is to make sure we have as secure elections as possible. We are at the really beginning stages of this,” said Air Force Maj. Gen. Rich Neely, head of the Illinois National Guard, reported Statescoop.
National Guard officials will receive security updates from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) in their work to support the midterms, Politico reported.
According to its website, CISA was created in 2018 under the Trump administration to work with government and industry partners to defend against current and predicted threats to cyber and physical infrastructure, including election infrastructure.
No Indication of Potential Election Infrastructure Disruption: CISA Director
CISA Director Jen Easterly has repeatedly said she doesn’t expect any major disruptions to the midterms. Most recently, on Nov. 1, at an event hosted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Easterly said that there is “no information credible or specific about efforts to disrupt or compromise” election infrastructure and that she was “very confident that we have done everything we can to make election infrastructure as secure and as resilient as possible.”
Air Force Maj. Gen. Rich Neely, head of the Illinois National Guard, said that he and his team are “not expecting to see anything.”
“But much like we did after Jan. 6, if the Guard’s called in, the Guard responds as needed,” he said, reported Statescoop. “We’re not expecting anything with what we’re seeing.”
Army Major General M. Todd Hunt, the adjutant general of the North Carolina National Guard, said at the media briefing on Nov. 4 that his state has a joint cyber mission center that will facilitate communication between the state’s cyber unit, its departments of Information Technology and Emergency Management, as well as federal contacts from CISA, the Department of Homeland Security, and the FBI.
According to the outlets, Hunt said there will be 25 National Guard members on duty in the cyber unit for North Carolina on Election Day, up from the usual core team of 10. The extra members will include federal and emergency management partners.
“We will surge during the election to ensure that we have 24-hour coverage throughout this whole process,” Hunt said, per Politico. “We are citizen soldiers, we live in this state, and we do have a vested interest in our state elections as well as our federal elections.”
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
About the Author: mechmedic
6 Comments
Comments are closed.
GUNS N GEAR
No Guard sent to secure an open southern border and stop wholesale invasion.
But sent to secure an election?
Now why would this possibly be a matter for concern?
Nothing to see here folks, just the national guard safeguarding voter corruption and preventing the blue states’ elite from getting tossed out on their asses in the midterm selection. The cheating will be taken to a new level for this one. Be ready.
Unfortunately, you are probably right.
Well, possibly they’ll be there to ensure fraud, but perhaps some will be set up to intercept/detect possible packet capture? Like Mike Lindell’s team that caught vote changes and attempts coming from China, Iran, Spain. There is no record unless you are monitoring the traffic in the moment.
It also makes you wonder exactly what a National Guard “Cyber-security” unit is supposed to do. The Internet as we know it was originally as joint public/private venture of the DOD, (DARPA) working with private industry and Universities. The former military communication project, (DARPANET) that ran for years like this was privatized in the early 1990’s and is no longer controlled by the DOD. The infrastructure that was in place largely was the property of the private owners, the telecom companies, universities, and private for profits like BBN. These private interests owned and maintained the routers, DNS servers, etc that allowed the TCPIP protocol to work on a continental and intercontinental scale. Government at all levels, (military included) continue to own and maintain their own subnets, private nets, and end nodes and outside facing firewalls just like any corporation or private individual would for that matter. This is still the case today to the best of my understanding,
So the question remains, what exactly is a bunch of part time NG specialists supposed to do about a hypothetical “attack” on some part of this vast infrastructure, the majority of which they do not own or control?
The TCPIP protocol was designed to provide redundant and survivable military communication after a nuclear attack. The protocol does this mostly by itself, that was the point of the whole thing. From reading the article, it sounds like in the case of a specific target, like election machines, that the intent is to facilitate early attack detection and help co-ordinate a federal law enforcement response. Defending against the technical attack is usually best accomplished by the IT security engineers who “own” the target. Sometimes they might need to talk to downstream peers, but that is not a given. The LE response is usually identifying the source of the attack, and is of little value while the attack itself is going on. The supposed value NG cyber units bring to the table here is a little dubious. If government were truly concerned about the integrity of the computerized and networked Dominion machines, we would not be using them at all or at least not exposing them to the Internet. Given the events of 2020, one has to wonder if we are being prepped for a widespread false flag cyberattack on election day. A party in power that is looking at a tidal wave of voter anger might just consider such a move if they expected to get killed in a fair election.
@Felix,
Several units were sent to the southern border but nothing was really achieved.
Regardless, unless we go back to paper ballots and can trust the counters, nothing will change politically speaking.