ATF Says The Quiet Part Out Loud

Submitted by Gun Owners of America,

Recently while responding to criticism on X, formally known as Twitter, the Los Angeles branch of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives tweeted that the $200 tax stamp on firearms and accessories regulated by the National Firearms Act was “quite prohibitive at the time, which was the goal of the NFA.”

Did the ATF just admit that the goal of the National Firearms Act was to prohibit gun ownership by making it too expensive for regular people? For reference, $200 in 1934 is equivalent to $4,688 today.

And for that matter, why is the Second Amendment treated as a second-class right? Imagine if the United States put a $200 tax on the First Amendment for the use of “dangerous” words.

We at Gun Owners of America have been saying for years that the 1934 National Firearms Act is an unconstitutional law that is incompatible with the Second Amendment. Over the years, ATF has proven that it will continue to use its power to widen the reach of the NFA to cover more and more firearms.

Recently, ATF expanded its definition of a Short-Barreled Rifle (SBR) to cover pistols equipped with a stabilizing brace. Estimates put the number of firearms affected by this rule change at up to 40 million. ATF will likely continue to expand its definitions of regulated items to cover as many firearms as possible as time goes on and gun control proposals continue to fail in Congress.

This is evidenced by the growing relationship between gun control groups and ATF. With the recently established office of gun violence prevention in the Biden administration, gun control groups now have a direct line from the White House, right to the Department of Justice.

Gun Owners of America is working to fight back against these and other examples of massive government overreach. Our lawsuit, GOA & Texas v. ATF, currently has the aforementioned ATF pistol brace rule stalled with an injunction for our members, and another case Britto v. ATF has been granted a nationwide injunction. In Congress, we’re working with our allies to pass the SHORT Act, which would remove short-barreled rifles entirely from the NFA.

This is where we’ll need your help. Please call your elected representatives and tell them to pass the SHORT Act and help stop the ATF from harassing law-abiding gun owners.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the Author: Patriotman

Patriotman currently ekes out a survivalist lifestyle in a suburban northeastern state as best as he can. He has varied experience in political science, public policy, biological sciences, and higher education. Proudly Catholic and an Eagle Scout, he has no military experience and thus offers a relatable perspective for the average suburban prepper who is preparing for troubled times on the horizon with less than ideal teams and in less than ideal locations. Brushbeater Store Page: http://bit.ly/BrushbeaterStore

4 Comments

  1. Plankmember January 14, 2024 at 11:03

    The seminal case is us v Miller and it was ruled that it was a prohibition disguised as a revenue generator….but much shenanigans when it was heard at the US Supreme court….or sorta heard. Good read as almost a hundred years later. Same Shit different century. Fuck the feds.

  2. Chris January 14, 2024 at 13:20

    John Ross’s Unintended Consequences has a good history on this and other firearm related history.

    • RP January 15, 2024 at 08:01

      Yep, very good read.

  3. Oughtsix January 14, 2024 at 16:50

    They can tax, prohibit, regulate, abuse, and fafo to their evil little hearts delight but… there are already enough guns and ammo out here to get the job done. An exercise that we all know will, sooner or later, have to be done.

    They want them, they will have to come and take them. If that were possible, they would have tried it already. It’s not possible. We have the numbers by an order of magnitude. The more egregious their lawlessness, the greater the resistance. When it becomes unmistakably clear, and enough atrocities have occurred, the law of “nothing left to lose” and the stark freedom which that both affords and demands will manifest the consequences which low level thugs will find “unintended.”

    Until that day, I will continue to do as I see fit, as a free American, my allegiance to God, family and friends, and to America and Americans who hold the founding values Sacred. The usfedcorpse no longer represents the country or the people, if indeed ever it did.

Comments are closed.

GUNS N GEAR

Categories

Archives