Let’s check in on Europe

I dont know anything personally about this Michael Stürzenberger guy, searching for his blog is unfindable at least in english, I see some gates of vienna posts https://gatesofvienna.net/topical/michael-sturzenberger/ here and one specific example of interest here https://gatesofvienna.net/2013/11/reform-the-koran/

If you do a general search online he’s called a nazi, and they said he went to prison for posting swastikas. If you look thru the list above it sounds like he posted a real (not photoshopped) historical photo of a ww2 nazi shaking hands with some muslim, I don’t know the context of it, but I know a slander campaign when I see it when in the interview on the koran he’s swearing solidarity with muslims who dont want to impose the shariah in europe/the west. This is exactly how they slandered father Charles Coughlin in the 1930’s where history calls him a nazi (you’ll see recent articles in the usual garbage press blaming him for the ‘original violent insurrection comparable to jan 6th’ and if you want to see proof that absolutely nothing has changed in 85-90 years go listen to some of his full length radio shows on archive.org or somewhere, theyre very hard to find, even in OTR archives. He literally speaks against nazis in nearly every issue and swears allegience with religious jews so of course they would have to lie about him and slander him a nazi and then lie about him being involved in an ‘insurrection’ to shut him down, which it successfully did by and large at the time, and we seem to have been under the same standard of fake news and BS winners write history writers ever since.

There are a few things worth saying about islam, which I almost never see mentioned anywhere and I dont know why.

Islam by it’s own definition is not reformable. It already had an attempted reformation 1000 years ago in the mutazila and after a period of coexistance where some truly tolerant and enlightened things were said, like things in the koran are only true because they are true first, leaving open the possibility that something has been misreported or changed (made more likely by the fact that there were multiple versions of the koran historically) and absolute literal interpretation should not be followed… all those people were murdered and darn near wiped out of history being called heretics. That was the muslims who wanted to get along peacefully – the ones who were murdered for it. Since then, the organized versions of islam said they could never allow anyone to get that far along ‘attempting to reform islam’ ever again and this is why you see the near insta-murder of people saying it needs reforming.

This would be like if the catholics had murdered martin luther, and then to prevent anyone from ever getting close enough to trying to reform them again, proactively murdered anyone sounding remotely like him complaining about anything in the future. Which they probably would have liked to do actually. (I am not trying to disparage catholic followers with this, just pointing out the church of that time was clearly corrupt regardless of how one chooses to explain it.)

I could post more on the issue but I don’t know if this will be posted or not as it is. I will also reiterate anyone wanting to see how news and slander hasn’t changed in 90 years should listen to some full episodes of Charles Coughlin, the anti-nazi telling religious jews he loves them and is on their side in nearly every episode so just like trump or alex jones they called a nazi after silencing him, and who gave one of the best and passionate defenses of christianity against communism i’ve ever heard in my life, and it’s going to sound like literally today, only the politicians names are different or amounts of money talked about for some corrupt bailout of wall street. Nothing has changed in the world. Listen to him before those archives disappear too.