Is Kamala even eligible to run?
Kamal Toe can't be President pic.twitter.com/IEc2hwdzoV
— Michael ❤️✝️🇺🇸 (@Michael59302787) July 21, 2024
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
About the Author: NC Scout
NC Scout is the nom de guerre of a former Infantry Scout and Sergeant in one of the Army’s best Reconnaissance Units. He has combat tours in both Iraq and Afghanistan. He teaches a series of courses focusing on small unit skills rarely if ever taught anywhere else in the prepping and survival field, including his RTO Course which focuses on small unit communications. In his free time he is an avid hunter, bushcrafter, writer, long range shooter, prepper, amateur radio operator and Libertarian activist. He can be contacted at [email protected] or via his blog at brushbeater.wordpress.com .
3 Comments
Comments are closed.
GUNS N GEAR
Ever since she was elected(?) vice-president, I have been telling people that Kamala was NOT constitutionally eligible to be vice-president for the very same reason that Barack Hussein Obama was NOT constitutionally eligible to be president, NEITHER ONE WAS A NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN as required by the Constitution to hold the office of President and vice-president. Obama’s father was Never a citizen of the United States, and Kamala’s parents did not become naturalized citizens until Kamala was five years old, five years too late to make her a natural-born citizen.
The problem is that “natural born citizen” has never been Constitutionally defined or a ruling made by SCOTUS of what it means.
The 14th Amendment does not address POTUS/VPOTUS eligibility but states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
The courts have already ruled on this when she was picked for VP in 2020. I do not see them changing their opinions now. She was born here but raised in Canada. I’ll bet you a stale Krispy Kreme that the courts either say that the question has already been adjudicated, or they will claim a lack of standing for the plaintiffs. It’s their easy out.