Shocking: Former Coast Guard Sharpshooter With Antifa Ties Arrested for Years of Death Threats Against President Trump
A former Coast Guard lieutenant with specialized training in marksmanship was taken into custody Monday on federal charges for allegedly making repeated death threats against President Donald Trump over a five-year period.
Peter Stinson, 57, of Oakton, Virginia, served as an officer in the United States Coast Guard from 1988 to 2021, earning recognition for his sharpshooting abilities during his decades-long military career.
Court documents reveal that Stinson also worked as an instructor for the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Incident Command Systems program, positions that required security clearances and public trust.
Federal prosecutors allege that Stinson identified himself as a member of the Antifa movement and used multiple social media platforms to transmit threatening messages targeting the President.
The criminal complaint details how Stinson allegedly posted violent threats on both X and Bluesky spanning from 2020 through 2025, using various code names to reference Trump.
Stinson used code names including “the orange,” “orange mf,” “orange thug,” “Krasnov,” “tfg,” “one ear” or an orange emoji when referring to Trump in his posts, according to the affidavit.
One of the earliest documented threats occurred in April 2020, when Stinson allegedly responded to another user’s post about suing Trump with the message: “somebody ought to do more than sue the orange mf’s a**.”
In that same exchange, Stinson reportedly added: “it involves a rifle and a scope, but I can’t talk about it here,” directly referencing his military training and expertise with firearms.
Another post cited in the complaint shows Stinson allegedly writing: “I’d be willing to pitch in $100 for a contract. Who wants to join me?”
“We could solve the solvable part of this problem in a crack. Then, we can focus on the coronavirus itself.”
The threats were not limited to guns, as charging documents indicate posts that suggested using “a gun, a knife and poison” against Trump.
In several instances, Newsweek reported that prosecutors say Stinson acknowledged he lacked certain skills but expressed willingness to participate in violence, allegedly offering to “pull the trigger” or serve as a “driver” for potential attacks.
The most recent post referenced in court documents was published on Bluesky on June 11, when Stinson allegedly wrote, “When he dies, the party is going to be yuge.”
Federal investigators documented numerous other threatening messages where Stinson allegedly expressed his intent to harm the President through violent means.
The investigation into Stinson’s activities appears to have been extensive, with law enforcement agencies monitoring his social media presence across multiple platforms over several years.
Court records indicate that Stinson’s threatening posts were not random outbursts but part of a sustained pattern of behavior that escalated in both frequency and specificity over time.
The Coast Guard confirmed that Stinson served with distinction for over three decades before his retirement in 2021, earning multiple awards and advancing through the ranks to lieutenant.
His subsequent work with FEMA would have required background checks and security clearances, positions that granted him access to sensitive emergency management protocols and government facilities.
Stinson’s arrest comes amid heightened security concerns surrounding threats against elected officials and demonstrates law enforcement’s commitment to prosecuting such cases to the full extent of the law.
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
2 Comments
Comments are closed.
The “Mayday Protest Movement” can refer to a few different, though sometimes overlapping, phenomena, primarily due to the date “May Day” (May 1st) often being a day for protests globally. Here’s a breakdown of the key information:
1. The 1971 May Day Protests against the Vietnam War:
What it was: A series of large-scale civil disobedience actions in Washington, D.C., from May 1-5, 1971, protesting the United States’ continued involvement in the Vietnam War.
Goals: The primary goal was to “shut down the U.S. federal government for at least one day” as a sanction for the government’s failure to end the war. Their slogan was: “If the government will not stop the war, we will stop the government.”
Organizers & Tactics: Organized largely by a group called the “Mayday Tribe” (a more militant segment of the anti-war movement), influenced by figures like Rennie Davis (one of the Chicago Seven). Protesters aimed to block roads and traffic circles nonviolently using stalled vehicles, barricades, or their bodies. They organized into small “affinity groups.”
Impact: While they didn’t fully shut down the government, the protests led to the largest mass arrests in U.S. history, with over 13,000 individuals arrested. The handling of these arrests raised civil rights concerns. Some observers believe the protests contributed to public opinion shifting against the war and put pressure on the Nixon administration to withdraw troops. It also pioneered a new model of decentralized organizing that influenced future movements.
2. International Workers’ Day (May Day) Protests:
Origins: May 1st was designated as International Workers’ Day in 1889 by an international federation of socialist groups and trade unions. This commemorates the Haymarket Affair, a violent confrontation in Chicago on May 4, 1886, where workers were striking for an eight-hour workday.
Global Significance: In many countries, May 1st is a public holiday honoring labor, often marked by parades and demonstrations advocating for workers’ rights, fair wages, safe working conditions, and broader social and economic justice.
Modern Issues: May Day protests continue worldwide, addressing issues like:
Labor rights: advocating for better pay, working conditions, and union protections.
Immigrant rights: especially prominent in the U.S. where May Day rallies shifted focus to immigration in 2006 to protest anti-immigrant legislation.
Economic grievances: protesting policies perceived as harmful to working-class families and advocating for shared prosperity.
Anti-war or specific political movements: depending on current global or national events (e.g., protests against the war in Gaza, or against specific government administrations).
Key Takeaways:
The term “Mayday Protest Movement” can specifically refer to the 1971 anti-Vietnam War protests in Washington, D.C.
More broadly, “May Day protests” refer to the long-standing tradition of demonstrations on May 1st, primarily linked to International Workers’ Day and advocating for labor and social justice issues.
These protests often involve a wide range of groups, including labor unions, immigrant rights organizations, civil liberties advocates, and various community organizations.
The May Day Protest Movement, particularly in its manifestation as International Workers’ Day, overwhelmingly leans left politically.
Here’s why:
Historical Roots: May Day (May 1st) was established as International Workers’ Day by an international federation of socialist groups and trade unions in 1889. It commemorates the Haymarket Affair in Chicago, a pivotal event in the labor movement’s fight for an eight-hour workday. These origins are deeply embedded in socialist and labor rights ideologies.
Core Issues: The issues consistently championed by May Day protests are traditionally associated with the political left:
Workers’ rights and union protections: Advocating for fair wages, safe working conditions, the right to organize, and collective bargaining.
Social and economic justice: Addressing wealth inequality, corporate power, and demanding a country that prioritizes “families over their fortunes—public schools over private profits, healthcare over hedge funds, prosperity over free market politics.”
Immigrant rights: A significant focus in the U.S., with protests opposing anti-immigrant legislation, demanding pathways to citizenship, and an end to deportations.
Anti-authoritarianism and anti-fascism: Many recent May Day protests, particularly in the U.S., have explicitly opposed what they view as authoritarian actions and policies of right-wing governments.
Anti-war and anti-imperialism: Historically, and in recent times (e.g., calls for a ceasefire in Gaza), May Day has been a platform for anti-war sentiment.
Support for marginalized communities: Including Black, Indigenous, and transgender communities.
Organizers and Participants: The movements and organizations that typically lead and participate in May Day protests include:
Labor unions (e.g., AFL-CIO)
Socialist and democratic socialist organizations (e.g., Democratic Socialists of America – DSA)
Immigrant rights groups
Various community and civil rights organizations
Progressive political figures (e.g., Bernie Sanders)
While specific protests might have unique nuances, the fundamental principles and demands of the May Day Protest Movement are firmly aligned with the left-wing political spectrum, focusing on collective action, social equity, workers’ empowerment, and challenging systemic inequalities.
For the 2023-2024 election cycle, the majority of Congressman Eric Swalwell’s funding comes from Large Individual Contributions, accounting for 71.34% of his campaign committee’s funds.
Other significant sources include:
PAC Contributions: 15.79%
Small Individual Contributions (< $200): 12.86%
His top contributors for this period include:
Kleiner, Perkins et al.
Mackenzie Capital Management
California Automotive Retailing Group
Gehry Partners
Susman Godfrey Llp
In terms of industries, the top sources of contributions for the 2023-2024 cycle are:
Retired individuals
Lawyers/Law Firms
Real Estate
Securities & Investment
Business Services
Susman Godfrey L.L.P. is a prominent national trial law firm. When you see them listed as a top contributor to a political campaign, it's important to understand how these contributions are typically aggregated.
According to OpenSecrets.org, when an organization like Susman Godfrey LLP is listed as a contributor, it means the money came from the organization's individual members, employees, or owners, and those individuals' immediate family members. Organizations themselves generally cannot contribute directly to candidates and party committees.
Here's what OpenSecrets.org data indicates about Susman Godfrey L.L.P.'s political contributions:
Overall Party Affiliation: Susman Godfrey's contributions heavily favor Democrats. For the 2024 cycle, 90.67% of their contributions went to Democrats, compared to 4.68% for Republicans.
Top Recipients: Besides Congressman Eric Swalwell, other top recipients of contributions from individuals associated with Susman Godfrey include:
DNC Services Corp
Kamala Harris
Adam Schiff
Colin Allred
Source of Funds: 100% of the funds attributed to Susman Godfrey on OpenSecrets.org come from individuals associated with the firm, rather than PACs or the firm itself.
Recent Developments: It's worth noting that Susman Godfrey has recently been in the news due to an executive order issued by the current administration (April 2025) that targets the firm, alleging it engages in activities detrimental to "critical American interests" and has "weaponized the American legal system." This order has led to legal challenges and statements of support for Susman Godfrey from various legal and civil liberties organizations, who argue it's an unconstitutional attempt to retaliate against the firm for its legal advocacy.