Why the US Supreme Court Skipped AR-15s This Term — And Why It’s Coming
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
NC Scout is the nom de guerre of a former Infantry Scout and Sergeant in one of the Army’s best Reconnaissance Units. He has combat tours in both Iraq and Afghanistan. He teaches a series of courses focusing on small unit skills rarely if ever taught anywhere else in the prepping and survival field, including his RTO Course which focuses on small unit communications. In his free time he is an avid hunter, bushcrafter, writer, long range shooter, prepper, amateur radio operator and Libertarian activist. He can be contacted at
[email protected] or via his blog at brushbeater.wordpress.com .
BS. The whole AR15-suppressor-machine gun question should have been put to bed in 1934. Instead, we get “se esta minyona.” While honest Americans get murdered and jailed over what EVERYONE knows are unconstitutional laws.
I mean damn. Bonnie & Clyde weren’t using suppressors were they?
Where was the NRA when “Miller” was before SCOTUS?
And since when does the right to protect oneself EXCLUDE one’s right to protect one’s hearing?
And just coincidence that not one lawyer in America has ever said those things to anyone. Especially in a courtroom.
Sorry, all I see is a “long train of usurpations and abuses leading inevitably to the same conclusion.” of tyranny lording over us once again.
And SCOTUS twittiling their thumbs like their waiting for someone to save them from having to embarrass all lawyer friends at parties. Or worse yet, not get invited to them anymore.
I mean, is the 2A that hard to read?
At this point all government has done is prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the whole system is fake, gaye, retarded, and criminal.
Thanks for allowing me the rant!