Electronic Frontier Foundation: Why Metadata Matters

This was originally written and published in 2013. In a world where Facebook is renaming itself Meta, those concerned with personal and operational security need to stay abreast of where their data is going. Social media is not your friend and compartmentalization must become better understood. Some have found out the hard way, and all I can tell you is, I did my due diligence. And I’ll continue to do so. After all, James Clapper told the world we kill people based on metadata and he wasn’t wrong. -NCS

Why Metadata Matters

June 7, 2013

In response to the recent news reports about the National Security Agency’s surveillance program, President Barack Obama said today, “When it comes to telephone calls, nobody is listening to your telephone calls.” Instead, the government was just “sifting through this so-called metadata.” The Director of National Intelligence James Clapper made a similar comment last night:  “The program does not allow the Government to listen in on anyone’s phone calls. The information acquired does not include the content of any communications or the identity of any subscriber.”

What they are trying to say is that disclosure of metadata—the details about phone calls, without the actual voice—isn’t a big deal, not something for Americans to get upset about if the government knows. Let’s take a closer look at what they are saying:

  • They know you rang a phone sex service at 2:24 am and spoke for 18 minutes. But they don’t know what you talked about.
  • They know you called the suicide prevention hotline from the Golden Gate Bridge. But the topic of the call remains a secret.
  • They know you spoke with an HIV testing service, then your doctor, then your health insurance company in the same hour. But they don’t know what was discussed.
  • They know you received a call from the local NRA office while it was having a campaign against gun legislation, and then called your senators and congressional representatives immediately after. But the content of those calls remains safe from government intrusion.
  • They know you called a gynecologist, spoke for a half hour, and then called the local Planned Parenthood’s number later that day. But nobody knows what you spoke about.

Sorry, your phone records—oops, “so-called metadata”—can reveal a lot more about the content of your calls than the government is implying. Metadata provides enough context to know some of the most intimate details of your lives.  And the government has given no assurances that this data will never be correlated with other easily obtained data. They may start out with just a phone number, but a reverse telephone directory is not hard to find. Given the public positions the government has taken on location information, it would be no surprise if they include location information demands in Section 215 orders for metadata.

If the President’s administration really welcomes a robust debate on the government’s surveillance power, it needs to start being honest about the invasiveness of collecting your metadata.

By |2021-11-08T08:59:04-05:00November 8, 2021|AP Staff, Tech and Privacy|5 Comments

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the Author:

NC Scout is the nom de guerre of a former Infantry Scout and Sergeant in one of the Army’s best Reconnaissance Units. He has combat tours in both Iraq and Afghanistan. He teaches a series of courses focusing on small unit skills rarely if ever taught anywhere else in the prepping and survival field, including his RTO Course which focuses on small unit communications. In his free time he is an avid hunter, bushcrafter, writer, long range shooter, prepper, amateur radio operator and Libertarian activist. He can be contacted at [email protected] or via his blog at .


  1. James Carpenter aka "Felix" November 8, 2021 at 09:29

    If you haven’t already, google “Bumblehive”, aka the “Utah Data Center”.
    And then riddle me this, Batman… do these theatric, conformitory “COVID” face masks defeat facial recognition or not?
    Social Credit Scores want to know!

    • NC Scout November 8, 2021 at 10:44

      In short, no, they don’t. Facial recognition collects a large number of points, just like fingerprints do. And like fingerprints, it only needs a small number of them to positively identify a target.

  2. James Carpenter aka "Felix" November 8, 2021 at 12:35

    COVID masks can’t defeat facial recognition – I was afraid that might be the case.
    Other methods between that and a full-on Guy Falkes mask might be worth reviewing.
    Between card purchases, phone tracking, the gazillion cameras now found everywhere, being the Gray Man seems to get more difficult every year.

    • NC Scout November 8, 2021 at 12:43

      Being “Grey” is not hard at all. Don’t be important.

  3. James Carpenter aka "Felix" November 8, 2021 at 12:37

    Sorry, should have been “Fawkes”. Think I need to get one, just on GP if nothing else.

Comments are closed.

Go to Top